Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLange, Siri
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-06T11:30:44Z
dc.date.available2021-05-06T11:30:44Z
dc.date.created2020-10-08T09:13:45Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedFocaal: Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology. 2020, 88 22-39.
dc.identifier.issn0920-1297
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2753927
dc.description.abstractIn the Nordic countries, unions are represented in company boards and can infl uence companies’ policies toward labor abroad. Th is article focuses on the Norwegian national oil company Equinor and its support of unionization of its employees in Tanzania. Th is was inspired by the Nordic tradition of social dialogue between corporations and strong, independent unions. Corporation managers and union representatives tend to refer to this social dialogue as “the Norwegian model,” but this is a narrow conceptualization of the model that disregards the role of the state. I argue that while it is benefi cial for the Tanzanian workers to be organized, it is probably also “good for business” to have unionized workers who have adopted the Nordic collaborative model, rather than a more radical union model.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBerghahnen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleDoing global investments the Nordic way. The "business case" for Equinor’s support to union work among its employees in Tanzaniaen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authoren_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2020.880102
dc.identifier.cristin1838098
dc.source.journalFocaal: Journal of Global and Historical Anthropologyen_US
dc.source.4088
dc.source.pagenumber22-39en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 240617en_US
dc.identifier.citationFocaal: Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology. 2020, 88: 22–39en_US
dc.source.volume88en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal