Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLynn, Joshua Scott
dc.contributor.authorKlanderud, Kari
dc.contributor.authorTelford, Richard James
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Deborah E.
dc.contributor.authorVandvik, Vigdis
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-14T14:21:10Z
dc.date.available2021-12-14T14:21:10Z
dc.date.created2021-07-01T12:01:30Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1354-1013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2834251
dc.description.abstractContext-dependencies in species' responses to the same climate change frustrate attempts to generalize and make predictions based on experimental and observational approaches in biodiversity science. Here, we propose predictability may be enhanced by explicitly incorporating macroecological context into analyses of species' responses to climate manipulations. We combined vascular plant species' responses to an 8-year, 12-site turf transplant climate change experiment set in southwestern Norway with climate niche data from the observed 151 species. We used the difference between a species' mean climate across their range and climate conditions at the transplant site (“climate differences”) to predict colonization probability, extinction probability, and change in abundance of a species at a site. In analyses across species that ignore species-specific patterns, colonization success increased as species' distribution optima were increasingly warmer than the experimental target site. Extinction probability increased as species' distribution optima were increasingly colder than the target site. These patterns were reflected in change in abundance analyses. We found weak responses to increased precipitation in these oceanic climates. Climate differences were better predictors of species' responses to climate manipulations than range size. Interestingly, similar patterns were found when analyses focused on variation in species-specific responses across sites. These results provide an experimental underpinning to observational studies that report thermophilization of communities and suggest that space-for-time substitutions may be valid for predicting species' responses to climate warming, given other conditions are accounted for (e.g., soil nutrients). Finally, we suggest that this method of putting climate change experiments into macroecological context has the potential to generalize and predict species' responses to climate manipulations globally.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMacroecological context predicts species' responses to climate warmingen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 the authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/gcb.15532
dc.identifier.cristin1919808
dc.source.journalGlobal Change Biologyen_US
dc.source.pagenumber2088-2101en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 274712en_US
dc.identifier.citationGlobal Change Biology. 2021, 27 (10), 2088-2101.en_US
dc.source.volume27en_US
dc.source.issue10en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal