Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAarsand, Aasne K.
dc.contributor.authorKristoffersen, Ann-Helen
dc.contributor.authorSandberg, Sverre
dc.contributor.authorStøve, Bård
dc.contributor.authorCoşkun, Abdurrahman
dc.contributor.authorFernandez-Calle, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Garzón, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Elena
dc.contributor.authorCeriotti, Ferruccio
dc.contributor.authorJonker, Niels
dc.contributor.authorRøraas, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorCarobene, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-03T10:25:01Z
dc.date.available2022-02-03T10:25:01Z
dc.date.created2021-10-08T14:06:30Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0009-9147
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2976838
dc.description.abstractBackground For biological variation (BV) data to be safely used, data must be reliable and relevant to the population in which they are applied. We used samples from the European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS) to determine BV of coagulation markers by a Bayesian model robust to extreme observations and used the derived within-participant BV estimates [CVP(i)] to assess the applicability of the BV estimates in clinical practice. Method Plasma samples were drawn from 92 healthy individuals for 10 consecutive weeks at 6 European laboratories and analyzed in duplicate for activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen, D-dimer, antithrombin (AT), protein C, protein S free, and factor VIII (FVIII). A Bayesian model with Student t likelihoods for samples and replicates was applied to derive CVP(i) and predicted BV estimates with 95% credibility intervals. Results For all markers except D-dimer, CVP(i) were homogeneously distributed in the overall study population or in subgroups. Mean within-subject estimates (CVI) were <5% for APTT, PT, AT, and protein S free, <10% for protein C and FVIII, and <12% for fibrinogen. For APTT, protein C, and protein S free, estimates were significantly lower in men than in women ≤50 years. Conclusion For most coagulation markers, a common CVI estimate for men and women is applicable, whereas for APTT, protein C, and protein S free, sex-specific reference change values should be applied. The use of a Bayesian model to deliver individual CVP(i) allows for improved interpretation and application of the data.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS): Biological Variation Data for Coagulation Markers Estimated by a Bayesian Modelen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2021en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/clinchem/hvab100
dc.identifier.cristin1944464
dc.source.journalClinical Chemistryen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1259-1270en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Chemistry. 2021, 67 (9), 1259-1270.en_US
dc.source.volume67en_US
dc.source.issue9en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal