Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMichel, Clio
dc.contributor.authorMadonna, Erica
dc.contributor.authorSpensberger, Clemens
dc.contributor.authorLi, Camille
dc.contributor.authorOutten, Stephen
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-09T12:59:17Z
dc.date.available2022-03-09T12:59:17Z
dc.date.created2021-12-08T15:25:32Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2984048
dc.description.abstractBlocking over Greenland is known to lead to strong surface impacts, such as ice sheet melting, and a change in its future frequency can have important consequences. However, as previous studies demonstrated, climate models underestimate the blocking frequency for the historical period. Even though some improvements have recently been made, the reasons for the model biases are still unclear. This study investigates whether models with realistic Greenland blocking frequency in winter have a correct representation of its dynamical drivers, most importantly, cyclonic wave breaking (CWB). Because blocking is a rare event and its representation is model-dependent, we use a multi-model large ensemble. We focus on two models that show typical Greenland blocking features, namely a ridge over Greenland and an equatorward-shifted jet over the North Atlantic. ECHAM6.3-LR has the best representation of CWB of the models investigated but only the second best representation of Greenland blocking frequency, which is underestimated by a factor of 2. While MIROC5 has the most realistic Greenland blocking frequency, it also has the largest (negative) CWB frequency bias, suggesting that another mechanism leads to blocking in this model. Composites over Greenland blocking days show that the present and future experiments of each model are very similar to each other in both amplitude and pattern and that there is no significant change in Greenland blocking frequency in the future. However, these projected changes in blocking frequency are highly uncertain as long as the mechanisms leading to blocking formation and maintenance in models remain poorly understood.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCopernicus Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleDynamical drivers of Greenland blocking in climate modelsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright Author(s) 2021en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/wcd-2-1131-2021
dc.identifier.cristin1966320
dc.source.journalWeather and Climate Dynamics (WCD)en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1131-1148en_US
dc.relation.projectNotur/NorStore: NS9770Ken_US
dc.identifier.citationWeather and Climate Dynamics. 2021, 2 (4), 1131-1148.en_US
dc.source.volume2en_US
dc.source.issue4en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal