Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFjølner, Jesper
dc.contributor.authorHaaland, Øystein Ariansen
dc.contributor.authorJung, Christian
dc.contributor.authorde Lange, Dylan W.
dc.contributor.authorSzczeklik, Wojciech
dc.contributor.authorLeaver, Susannah
dc.contributor.authorGuidet, Bertrand
dc.contributor.authorSviri, Sigal
dc.contributor.authorVan Heerden, Peter Vernon
dc.contributor.authorBeil, Michael
dc.contributor.authorHartog, Christiane S.
dc.contributor.authorFlaatten, Hans Kristian
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T12:13:09Z
dc.date.available2022-09-14T12:13:09Z
dc.date.created2022-09-12T16:00:29Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0001-5172
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3017830
dc.description.abstractBackground The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a shortage of intensive care resources. Intensivists' opinion of triage and ventilator allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic is not well described. Methods This was a survey concerning patient numbers, bed capacity, triage guidelines, and three virtual cases involving ventilator allocations. Physicians from 400 ICUs in a research network were invited to participate. Preferences were assessed with a five-point Likert scale. Additionally, age, gender, work experience, geography, and religion were recorded. Results Of 437 responders 31% were female. The mean age was 44.4 (SD 11.1) with a mean ICU experience of 13.7 (SD 10.5) years. Respondents were mostly European (88%). Sixty-six percent had triage guidelines available. Younger patients and caretakers of children were favoured for ventilator allocation although this was less clear if this involved withdrawal of the ventilator from another patient. Decisions did not differ with ICU experience, gender, religion, or guideline availability. Consultation of colleagues or an ethical committee decreased with age and male gender. Conclusion Intensivists appeared to prioritise younger patients for ventilator allocation. The tendency to consult colleagues about triage decreased with age and male gender. Many found such tasks to be not purely medical and that authorities should assume responsibility for triage during resource scarcity.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleWho gets the ventilator? A multicentre survey of intensivists' opinions of triage during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemicen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/aas.14094
dc.identifier.cristin2050937
dc.source.journalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavicaen_US
dc.source.pagenumber859-868en_US
dc.identifier.citationActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2022, 66 (7), 859-868.en_US
dc.source.volume66en_US
dc.source.issue7en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal