Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBjorland, Line
dc.contributor.authorKurz, Kathinka Dæhli
dc.contributor.authorFluge, Øystein
dc.contributor.authorGilje, Bjørnar
dc.contributor.authorMahesparan, Rupavathana
dc.contributor.authorSætran, Hege Aase
dc.contributor.authorUshakova, Anastasia
dc.contributor.authorFarbu, Elisabeth
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-12T10:06:56Z
dc.date.available2022-12-12T10:06:56Z
dc.date.created2022-11-25T12:40:50Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2632-2498
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3037196
dc.description.abstractBackground Butterfly glioblastoma is a rare subgroup of glioblastoma with a bihemispheric tumor crossing the corpus callosum, and is associated with a dismal prognosis. Prognostic factors are previously sparsely described and optimal treatment remains uncertain. We aimed to analyze clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes from butterfly glioblastoma in a real-world setting. Methods This retrospective population-based cohort study included patients diagnosed with butterfly glioblastoma in Western Norway between 01/01/2007 and 31/12/2014. We enrolled patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma and patients with a diagnosis based on a typical MRI pattern. Clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records. Molecular and MRI volumetric analyses were retrospectively performed. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results Among 381 patients diagnosed with glioblastoma, 33 patients (8.7%) met the butterfly glioblastoma criteria. Median overall survival was 5.5 months (95% CI 3.1–7.9) and 3-year survival was 9.1%. Hypofractionated radiation therapy with or without temozolomide was the most frequently used treatment strategy, given to 16 of the 27 (59.3%) patients receiving radiation therapy. Best supportive care was associated with poorer survival compared with multimodal treatment [adjusted hazard ratio 5.11 (95% CI 1.09–23.89)]. Conclusion Outcome from butterfly glioblastoma was dismal, with a median overall survival of less than 6 months. However, long-term survival was comparable to that observed in non-butterfly glioblastoma, and multimodal treatment was associated with longer survival. This suggests that patients with butterfly glioblastoma may benefit from a more aggressive treatment approach despite the overall poor prognosis.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleButterfly glioblastoma: Clinical characteristics, treatment strategies and outcomes in a population-based cohorten_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumbervdac102en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/noajnl/vdac102
dc.identifier.cristin2080995
dc.source.journalNeuro-Oncology Advances (NOA)en_US
dc.identifier.citationNeuro-Oncology Advances (NOA). 2022, 4 (1), vdac102.en_US
dc.source.volume4en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal