Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorJörgensen, Karolina Maria
dc.contributor.authorClemmensen, Karina E.
dc.contributor.authorWallander, Håkan
dc.contributor.authorLindahl, Björn D.
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-14T11:46:13Z
dc.date.available2023-04-14T11:46:13Z
dc.date.created2022-12-14T10:58:58Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0028-646X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3063108
dc.description.abstractEctomycorrhizal exploration types are commonly assumed to denote spatial foraging patterns and resource-related niches of extraradical mycelia. However, empirical evidence of the consistency of foraging strategies within exploration types is lacking. Here, we analysed ectomycorrhizal foraging patterns by incubating root-excluding ingrowth mesh bags filled with six different substrates in mature Picea abies forests. High-throughput sequencing was used to characterise ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in the mesh bags and on adjacent fine roots after one growing season. Contrary to expectations, many ectomycorrhizal genera of exploration types that are thought to produce little extraradical mycelium colonised ingrowth bags extensively, whereas genera commonly associated with ample mycelial production occurred sparsely in ingrowth bags relative to their abundance on roots. Previous assumptions about soil foraging patterns of exploration types do not seem to hold. Instead, we propose that variation in the proliferation of extraradical mycelium is related to intergeneric differences in mycelial longevity and the mobility of targeted resources.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleDo ectomycorrhizal exploration types reflect mycelial foraging strategies?en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nph.18566
dc.identifier.cristin2092957
dc.source.journalNew Phytologisten_US
dc.source.pagenumber576-584en_US
dc.identifier.citationNew Phytologist. 2022, 237 (2), 576-584 .en_US
dc.source.volume237en_US
dc.source.issue2en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal