Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNezhadali, Mohammad
dc.contributor.authorBhakta, Tuhin
dc.contributor.authorFossum, Kristian
dc.contributor.authorMannseth, Trond
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-26T13:31:15Z
dc.date.available2023-06-26T13:31:15Z
dc.date.created2023-03-09T13:24:14Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn1420-0597
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3073272
dc.description.abstractWe consider estimation of absolute permeability from inverted seismic data. Large amounts of simultaneous data, such as inverted seismic data, enhance the negative effects of Monte Carlo errors in ensemble-based Data Assimilation (DA). Multilevel (ML) models consist of a selection of models with different fidelities. Multilevel Data Assimilation (MLDA) attempts to obtain a better statistical accuracy with a small sacrifice of the numerical accuracy. Spatial grid coarsening is one way of generating an ML model. It has been shown that coarsening the spatial grid results in a problem with weaker nonlinearity, and hence, in a less challenging problem than the problem on the original fine grid. Accordingly, formulating a sequential MLDA algorithm which uses the coarser models in the first steps of the DA, followed by the finer models, helps to find an approximation to the solution of the inverse problem at the first steps and gradually converge to the solution. We present two variants of a sequential MLDA algorithm and compare their performance with both conventional DA algorithms and a simultaneous (i.e., using all the models on the different grids simultaneously) MLDA algorithm using numerical experiments. Both posterior parameters and posterior model forecasts are compared qualitatively and quantitatively. The results from numerical experiments suggest that all MLDA algorithms generally perform better than the conventional DA algorithms. In estimation of the posterior parameter fields, the simultaneous MLDA algorithm and one of the variants of sequential MLDA (SMLES-H) perform similarly and slightly better than the other variant (SMLES-S). While in estimation of the posterior model forecasts, SMLES-S clearly performs better than both the simultaneous MLDA algorithm and SMLES-H.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSequential multilevel assimilation of inverted seismic dataen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 the authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10596-023-10191-9
dc.identifier.cristin2132787
dc.source.journalComputational Geosciencesen_US
dc.source.pagenumber265-287en_US
dc.identifier.citationComputational Geosciences. 2023, 27, 265-287.en_US
dc.source.volume27en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal