Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSvensson, Gunilla
dc.contributor.authorMurto, Sonja
dc.contributor.authorShupe, Matthew D.
dc.contributor.authorPithan, Felix
dc.contributor.authorMagnusson, Linus
dc.contributor.authorDay, Jonathan J.
dc.contributor.authorDoyle, James D.
dc.contributor.authorRenfrew, Ian A.
dc.contributor.authorSpengler, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorVihma, Timo
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-15T08:39:42Z
dc.date.available2023-08-15T08:39:42Z
dc.date.created2023-07-27T12:23:12Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2325-1026
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3084033
dc.description.abstractIn the spring period of the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition, an initiative was in place to increase the radiosounding frequency during warm air intrusions in the Atlantic Arctic sector. Two episodes with increased surface temperatures were captured during April 12–22, 2020, during a targeted observing period (TOP). The large-scale circulation efficiently guided the pulses of warm air into the Arctic and the observed surface temperature increased from −30°C to near melting conditions marking the transition to spring, as the temperatures did not return to values below −20°C. Back-trajectory analysis identifies 3 pathways for the transport. For the first temperature maximum, the circulation guided the airmass over the Atlantic to the northern Norwegian coast and then to the MOSAiC site. The second pathway was from the south, and it passed over the Greenland ice sheet and arrived at the observational site as a warm but dry airmass due to precipitation on the windward side. The third pathway was along the Greenland coast and the arriving airmass was both warm and moist. The back trajectories originating from pressure levels between 700 and 900 hPa line up vertically, which is somewhat surprising in this dynamically active environment. The processes acting along the trajectory originating from 800 hPa at the MOSAIC site are analyzed. Vertical profiles and surface energy exchange are presented to depict the airmass transformation based on ERA5 reanalysis fields. The TOP could be used for model evaluation and Lagrangian model studies to improve the representation of the small-scale physical processes that are important for airmass transformation. A comparison between MOSAiC observations and ERA5 reanalysis demonstrates challenges in the representation of small-scale processes, such as turbulence and the contributions to various terms of the surface energy budget, that are often misrepresented in numerical weather prediction and climate models.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of California Pressen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleWarm air intrusions reaching the MOSAiC expedition in April 2020- The YOPP targeted observing period (TOP)en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber00016en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1525/elementa.2023.00016
dc.identifier.cristin2163772
dc.source.journalElementa: Science of the Anthropoceneen_US
dc.identifier.citationElementa: Science of the Anthropocene. 2023, 11 (1), 00016.en_US
dc.source.volume11en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal