Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMuurling, Marijn
dc.contributor.authorde Boer, Casper
dc.contributor.authorVairavan, Srinivasan
dc.contributor.authorHarms, Robbert L.
dc.contributor.authorChadha, Antonella Santuccione
dc.contributor.authorTarnanas, Ioannis
dc.contributor.authorLuis, Estefania Vilarino
dc.contributor.authorReliga, Dorota
dc.contributor.authorGjestsen, Martha Therese
dc.contributor.authorGalluzzi, Samantha
dc.contributor.authorIbarria Sala, Marta
dc.contributor.authorKoychev, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorHausner, Lucrezia
dc.contributor.authorGkioka, Mara
dc.contributor.authorAarsland, Dag
dc.contributor.authorVisser, Pieter Jelle
dc.contributor.authorBrem, Anna-Katharine
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T12:32:41Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T12:32:41Z
dc.date.created2024-01-02T14:41:34Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2398-6352
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3121807
dc.description.abstractAugmented reality (AR) apps, in which the virtual and real world are combined, can recreate instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and are therefore promising to measure cognition needed for IADL in early Alzheimer’s disease (AD) both in the clinic and in the home settings. The primary aim of this study was to distinguish and classify healthy controls (HC) from participants with AD pathology in an early AD stage using an AR app. The secondary aims were to test the association of the app with clinical cognitive and functional tests and investigate the feasibility of at-home testing using AR. We furthermore investigated the test-retest reliability and potential learning effects of the task. The digital score from the AR app could significantly distinguish HC from preclinical AD (preAD) and prodromal AD (proAD), and preAD from proAD, both with in-clinic and at-home tests. For the classification of the proAD group, the digital score (AUCclinic_visit = 0.84 [0.75–0.93], AUCat_home = 0.77 [0.61–0.93]) was as good as the cognitive score (AUC = 0.85 [0.78–0.93]), while for classifying the preAD group, the digital score (AUCclinic_visit = 0.66 [0.53–0.78], AUCat_home = 0.76 [0.61–0.91]) was superior to the cognitive score (AUC = 0.55 [0.42–0.68]). In-clinic and at-home tests moderately correlated (rho = 0.57, p < 0.001). The digital score was associated with the clinical cognitive score (rho = 0.56, p < 0.001). No learning effects were found. Here we report the AR app distinguishes HC from otherwise healthy Aβ-positive individuals, both in the outpatient setting and at home, which is currently not possible with standard cognitive tests.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNatureen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAugmented reality versus standard tests to assess cognition and function in early Alzheimer’s diseaseen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber234en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41746-023-00978-6
dc.identifier.cristin2219117
dc.source.journalnpj Digital Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citationnpj Digital Medicine. 2023, 6 (1), 234.en_US
dc.source.volume6en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal