Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVanden Bossche, Dorien
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Q. Jane
dc.contributor.authorAres-Blanco, Sara
dc.contributor.authorPeña, Maria Pilar Astier
dc.contributor.authorDecat, Peter
dc.contributor.authorKondo, Naoki
dc.contributor.authorKroneman, Madelon
dc.contributor.authorNishioka, Daisuke
dc.contributor.authorPetrazzuoli, Ferdinando
dc.contributor.authorRørtveit, Guri
dc.contributor.authorSchaubroeck, Emmily
dc.contributor.authorStark, Stefanie
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Andrew D.
dc.contributor.authorWillems, Sara
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-19T12:37:32Z
dc.date.available2024-03-19T12:37:32Z
dc.date.created2023-10-13T13:09:17Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn1475-9276
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3123127
dc.description.abstractBackground The COVID-19 pandemic substantially magnified the inequity gaps among vulnerable populations. Both public health (PH) and primary health care (PHC) have been crucial in addressing the challenges posed by the pandemic, especially in the area of vulnerable populations. However, little is known about the intersection between PH and PHC as a strategy to mitigate the inequity gap. This study aims to assess the collaboration between PHC and PH with a focus on addressing the health needs of vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic across jurisdictions. Methods We analyzed and compared data from jurisdictional reports of COVID-19 pandemic responses in PHC and PH in Belgium, Canada (Ontario), Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, and Spain from 2020 to 2021. Results Four themes emerge from the analysis: (1) the majority of the countries implemented outreach strategies targeting vulnerable groups as a means to ensure continued access to PHC; (2) digital assessment in PHC was found to be present across all the countries; (3) PHC was insufficiently represented at the decision-making level; (4) there is a lack of clear communication channels between PH and PHC in all the countries. Conclusions This study identified opportunities for collaboration between PHC and PH to reduce inequity gaps and to improve population health, focusing on vulnerable populations. The COVID-19 response in these eight countries has demonstrated the importance of an integrated PHC system. Consequently, the development of effective strategies for responding to and planning for pandemics should take into account the social determinants of health in order to mitigate the unequal impact of COVID-19. Careful, intentional coordination between PH and PHC should be established in normal times as a basis for effective response during future public health emergencies. The pandemic has provided significant insights on how to strengthen health systems and provide universal access to healthcare by fostering stronger connections between PH and PHC.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAddressing health inequity during the COVID-19 pandemic through primary health care and public health collaboration: a multiple case study analysis in eight high-income countriesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber171en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12939-023-01968-6
dc.identifier.cristin2184474
dc.source.journalInternational Journal for Equity in Healthen_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal for Equity in Health. 2023, 22 (1), 171.en_US
dc.source.volume22en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal