Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorel Hachem, Wissam
dc.contributor.authorKhoury, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorHarik, Ramy
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-05T07:15:45Z
dc.date.available2016-07-05T07:15:45Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.PublishedJournal of Industrial Engineering and Management 2015, 8(5):1491-1511eng
dc.identifier.issn2013-8423
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/12248
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The proposed methodology hopes to provide a systematic multi-disciplinary approach to assess the thermal environment while minimizing unneeded efforts. Design/methodology/approach: Different factors affect the perception of the human thermal experience: metabolic rate (biology), surrounding temperatures (heat balance and environmental factors) and cognitive treatment (physiology).This paper proposes a combination of different multidisciplinary variables to generate a unique heat comfort assessment methodology. The variables at stake are physiological, biological, and environmental. Our own heat analysis is thoroughly presented and all relevant equations are described. Findings: Most companies are oblivious about potential dangers of heat stress accidents and thus about methods to monitor and prevent them. This methodology enables the company or the concerned individual to conduct a preliminary assessment with minimal wasted resources and time in unnecessary steps whilst providing a guideline for a detailed study with minimal error rates if needed. More so, thermal comfort is an integral part of sound ergonomics practices, which in turn are decisive for the success of any lean six sigma initiative. Research limitations/implications: This methodology requires several full implementations to finalize its design. Originality/value: Most used heat comfort models are inherently uncertain and tiresome to apply. An extensive literature review confirms the need for a uniform assessment methodology that combines the different thermal comfort models such as the Fanger comfort model (PMV, PPD) and WGBT since high error rates coupled with tiresome calculations often hinder the thermal assessment process.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherOmnia Scienceeng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BY-NCeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/eng
dc.subjectheat indexeng
dc.subjectcomfort assessmenteng
dc.subjectWBGTeng
dc.subjectFanger Comfort Modeleng
dc.subjectglobe temperatureeng
dc.titleCombining several thermal indices to generate a unique heat comfort assessment methodologyeng
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.date.updated2016-04-11T08:18:02Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2015 The Authorsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1521
dc.identifier.cristin1342090


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY-NC
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY-NC