Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEggebø, Torbjørn Moeen_US
dc.contributor.authorKlefstad, Olav-Andreen_US
dc.contributor.authorØkland, Ingeren_US
dc.contributor.authorLindtjørn, Elsaen_US
dc.contributor.authorEik-Nes, Sturlaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGjessing, Håkon K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-06T12:12:14Z
dc.date.available2018-09-06T12:12:14Z
dc.date.issued2017-02
dc.PublishedEggebø TM, Klefstad O, Økland I, Lindtjørn E, Eik-Nes S, Gjessing HK. Estimation of fetal weight in pregnancies past term. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2017;96(2):183-189eng
dc.identifier.issn1600-0412
dc.identifier.issn0001-6349
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/18423
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of the study was to investigate the accuracy of estimating fetal weight with ultrasound in pregnancies past term, using the eSnurra algorithm. Material and methods: In all, 419 women with pregnancy length of 290 days, attending a specialist consultation at Stavanger University Hospital, Norway, were included in a prospective observational study. Fetal weight was estimated using biparietal diameter (BPD) and abdominal circumference (AC). The algorithm implemented in an electronic calculation (eSnurra) was used to compute estimated fetal weight (EFW). Results were compared with birthweight (BW). Results: The mean interval between the ultrasound examination and birth was 2 days (SD 1.4). The median difference between BW and EFW was −6 g (CI −40 to +25 g) and the median percentage error was –0.1% (95% CI −1.0 to 0.6%). The median absolute difference was 190 g (95% CI 170–207 g). The BW was within 10% of EFW in 83% (95% CI 79–87%) of cases and within 15% of EFW in 94% (95% CI 92–96%) of cases. Limits of agreement (95%) were from −553 g to +556 g. Using 5% false‐positive rates, the sensitivity in detecting macrosomic and small for gestational age fetuses was 54% (95% CI 35–72%) and 49% (95% CI 35–63%), respectively. Conclusion: The accuracy of fetal weight estimation was good. Clinicians should be aware of limitations related to prediction at the upper and lower end, and the importance of choosing appropriate cut‐off levels.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherWileyeng
dc.subjectUltrasoundeng
dc.subjectprenatal diagnosiseng
dc.subjectdeliveryeng
dc.titleEstimation of fetal weight in pregnancies past termen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2018-02-23T14:17:55Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2016 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13044
dc.identifier.cristin1448527
dc.source.journalActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel