dc.contributor.author | Picot, Georg Johannes | |
dc.contributor.author | Marx, Paul | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-17T08:26:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-17T08:26:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.Published | Picot GJ, Marx P. Three approaches to labor-market vulnerability and political preferences. Political Science Research and Methods. 2020;8:(2):356-361 | eng |
dc.identifier.issn | 2049-8470 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2049-8489 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1956/21904 | |
dc.description.abstract | This contribution starts by presenting the three main approaches that political scientists use to analyze labor market vulnerability. We proceed to discuss various operationalizations of labor market vulnerability. We examine how they relate to the three theoretical approaches and we evaluate the consistency between theory and measurement. Finally, we recommend three measures that political scientists should deploy when analyzing the effect of labor market vulnerability on political preferences. We point out what each of these variables captures and what methodological challenges should be taken into account when using them. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | eng |
dc.title | Three approaches to labor-market vulnerability and political preferences | eng |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.date.updated | 2019-11-12T14:34:54Z | |
dc.description.version | acceptedVersion | |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright The European Political Science Association 2019 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.29 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1746642 | |
dc.source.journal | Political Science Research and Methods | |