Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMaeda, Christina Mosseseng
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-29T10:55:32Z
dc.date.available2015-06-29T10:55:32Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-01
dc.date.submitted2015-06-01eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/10103
dc.description.abstractThis study has been an attempt to address to what extent school boards as one of the user committees in education system are empowered and effective in accomplishing their responsibilities. The study had four specific objectives which were to examine the process involved in selecting board members; to examine the extent to which school board members were informed of their responsibilities; to examine board members access to resources and to asses' degree of autonomy possessed by school boards in making decisions. The study was focused on the two LGA's (Moshi Rural district council and Hai district council) where two schools were chosen one from each LGA, therefore the study was comparative. The two schools were studied in detail to examine if there was any significant difference between community public school and government public school in terms of how their school boards are empowered to accomplish their responsibilities effectively. The study employed qualitative approach where data was collected from in-depth interview, documentary review and direct observation. The sample size was 34 people who were chosen purposeful from different groups composed students, education officials, teachers and school board members. The empowerment theory was used to formulate the analytical framework which was used in analyzing the level of empowerment and effectiveness of the two mentioned cases. Key empowerment indicators which are access to information, access to resources, board selection procedure and autonomy were analyzed. From the findings, it was realized that school A which was government school was doing better compared to school B which is a community school due to the fact that most of its board members were more educated that those from school B. Not only that but school A was receiving full support from government grants something which contributed them to have better resources than school B which was partly depending on the community contribution which affected their financial resource base. Generally, the study concluded that although school boards from the studied cases are trying to accomplish their responsibilities but empowerment and effectiveness is still a promise far from reality due to the fact that school boards still suffer from lack of important information that helps them to participate in making school decisions like planning. The schools also lack enough educated human resources and proper mechanism to train school boards so this made them to have less potentiality in making school decisions. Also lack of enough access to financial resources as a result of poverty and low government budget affect their level of empowerment. Most of all the fact that, school boards are still considered as the voluntary advisory councils so this affects their level of autonomy in influencing school decision. Therefore this portrays that school boards are symbolic representatives who are there to fulfill or verify what is planned by other actors such as teachers, LGA's or central government.en_US
dc.format.extent2033433 byteseng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfeng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherThe University of Bergeneng
dc.rightsCopyright the Author. All rights reservedeng
dc.subjectcommunity public schooleng
dc.subjectgovernment public schooleng
dc.subjectqualitative approacheng
dc.subjectboard selectioneng
dc.subjectschool boardseng
dc.titleEmpowering locals through school governance: A case of secondary school boards in Tanzaniaeng
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster i Master of Philosophy in Public Administration
dc.description.localcodeAORG351
dc.description.localcodeMASV-PUBAD
dc.subject.nus731111eng
fs.subjectcodeAORG351


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel