Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLindemark, Frodeen_US
dc.contributor.authorHaaland, Øystein Ariansenen_US
dc.contributor.authorKvåle, Reidaren_US
dc.contributor.authorFlaatten, Hansen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohansson, Kjell Arneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-23T10:36:00Z
dc.date.available2016-02-23T10:36:00Z
dc.date.issued2015-05-26
dc.PublishedPLoS ONE 2015, 10(5)eng
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/11297
dc.description.abstractBackground: Knowledge about the expected life years gained from intensive care unit (ICU) admission could inform priority-setting decisions across groups of ICU patients and across medical specialties. The aim of this study was to estimate expected remaining lifetime for patients admitted to ICUs during 2008–2010 and to estimate the gain in life years from ICU admission. Methods: This is a descriptive, population modelling study of 30,712 adult mixed ICU admissions from the Norwegian Intensive Care Registry. The expected remaining lifetime for each patient was estimated using a decision-analytical model. Transition probabilities were based on registered Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, and standard and adjusted Norwegian life-tables. Results: The hospital mortality was 19.4% (n = 5,958 deaths). 24% of the patients were estimated to die within the first year after ICU admission in our model. Under an intermediate (base case), optimistic (O), and pessimistic (P) scenario with respect to long-term mortality, the average expected remaining lifetime was 19.4, 19.9, and 12.7 years. The majority of patients had a life expectancy of more than five years (84.8% in the base case, 89.4% in scenario O, and 55.6% in scenario P), and few had a life expectancy of less than one year (0.7%, 0.1%, and 12.7%). The incremental gain from ICU admission compared to counterfactual general ward care was estimated to be 0.04 (scenario P, age 85+) to 1.14 (scenario O, age < 45) extra life years per patient. Conclusions: Our research demonstrated a novel way of using routinely collected registry data to estimate and evaluate the expected lifetime outcomes for ICU patients upon admission. The majority had high life expectancies. The youngest age groups seemed to benefit the most from ICU admission. The study raises the question whether availability and rationing of ICU services are too strict in Norway.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherPLOSeng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BY 4.0eng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0eng
dc.subjectNorwegian Intensive Careeng
dc.titleAge, risk, and life expectancy in Norwegian intensive care: a registry-based population modelling study.en_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2016-02-04T14:15:41Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2015 Lindemark et al.
dc.source.articlenumbere0125907
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125907
dc.identifier.cristin1309895
dc.source.journalPLoS ONE
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700en_US
dc.source.volume10
dc.source.issue5


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY 4.0
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY 4.0