Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMøller, Per
dc.contributor.authorReis, MM
dc.contributor.authorEvans, G
dc.contributor.authorVasen, H
dc.contributor.authorHaites, N
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, E
dc.contributor.authorSteel, CM
dc.contributor.authorApold, Jaran
dc.contributor.authorLallo, F
dc.contributor.authorMæhle, L
dc.contributor.authorPreece, P
dc.contributor.authoret al., -
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-09T07:31:22Z
dc.date.available2016-06-09T07:31:22Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.PublishedDisease Markers 1999, 15:179-186eng
dc.identifier.issn0278-0240en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/12083
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Surveillance programmes for women at increased genetic risk of breast cancer are being established worldwide but little is known of their efficacy in early detection of cancers and hence reduction in mortality. METHODS: Data were contributed from seven centres participating in the EU Demonstration Programme on Clinical Services for Familial Breast Cancer. All breast tumours (n = 161) detected prospectively, from the time of enrolment of women in a screening programme, were recorded. Analysis took account of age at diagnosis, whether tumours were screen-detected or not, their pathological stage and outcome by Kaplan—Meier survival plots. RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis was 48.6 years. Overall, 75% of tumours were detected in the course of planned examinations. For women under age 50 at diagnosis, this figure was 68%. Eighteen percent were mammographically negative, (23% in patients under age 50). At first (“prevalence”) round and at follow-up screening, 16% and 22% of tumours respectively were carcinoma in situ (CIS) while 27% and 22% respectively had evidence of nodal or distant spread (CaN+). Comparison of screen-detected and other tumours showed that the latter were more frequently mammogram-negative and CaN+. Overall five-year survival was 89% and five-year event-free survival 86%. Five-year event-free survival was 100% for CIS, 88% for invasive cancer without nodal or distant spread and 67% for CaN+. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of cancers arising in women at increased genetic risk of breast cancer can be detected by planned screening, even in those under age 50. Surveillance should include regular expert clinical examination and teaching of “breast awareness” as well as mammography. Attention to the logistics of screening programmes may improve still further the proportion of tumours that are screen-detected. The trend towards earlier pathological stage in tumours detected during follow-up rounds and the preliminary findings on survival analysis suggest that this approach will prove to be of long-term benefit for breast cancer families.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherHindawi Publishing Corporationen_US
dc.rightsAttribution CC BY 3.0eng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/eng
dc.subjectinheritedeng
dc.subjectfamilialeng
dc.subjectbreast cancereng
dc.subjectprognosiseng
dc.subjectstageeng
dc.subjectdiagnosiseng
dc.subjectsurvivaleng
dc.subjectscreeningeng
dc.subjectmammographyeng
dc.titleEfficacy of early diagnosis and treatment in women with a family history of breast canceren_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2016-04-07T08:45:17Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 1999 Hindawi Publishing Corporationen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1155/1999/805420
dc.identifier.cristin390692
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY 3.0