Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAmurwon, Jovitaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHajdu, Floraen_US
dc.contributor.authorSeeley, Janeten_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-21T09:36:13Z
dc.date.available2016-06-21T09:36:13Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-27
dc.PublishedInternational Journal for Equity in Health. 2015 Oct 27;14(1):105eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/12150
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Predicting the household’s ability to cope with adult illness and death can be complicated in low-income countries with high HIV prevalence and multiple other stressors and shocks. This study explored the link between stage of the household in the life cycle and the household’s capacity to cope with illness and death of adults in rural Uganda. Methods Interviews focusing on life histories were combined with observations during monthly visits to 22 households throughout 2009, and recorded livelihood activities and responses to illness and death events. For the analysis, households were categorised into three life cycle stages (‘Young’, ‘Middle-aged’ and ‘Old’) and the ability to cope and adapt to recorded events of prolonged illness or death was assessed. Results In 16 of the 26 recorded events, a coping or struggling outcome was found to be related to household life cycle stage. ‘Young’ households usually had many dependants too young to contribute significantly to livelihoods, so were vulnerable to illness or death of the household head specifically. ‘Middle-aged’ households had adult children who participated in activities that contributed to livelihoods at home or sent remittances. More household members meant livelihood diversification, so these households usually coped best. Worst off were ‘Old’ households, where members were unable to work hard and often supported young grandchildren, while their adult children had stopped sending remittances as they had established households of their own. Conclusions While households may adopt diverse coping mechanisms, the stage in the household life cycle when stressful events occur is important for coping outcomes. Households of the elderly and households with many young dependents are clearly vulnerable. These results demonstrate that household life cycle analysis can be useful in assessing ability to respond to stressors and shocks, including AIDS-related illness and death.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BY 4.0eng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0eng
dc.subjectAgeeng
dc.subjectCapabilityeng
dc.subjectDependency-ratioeng
dc.subjectDiversificationeng
dc.subjectLivelihoodeng
dc.subjectLongitudinal studieseng
dc.subjectShockeng
dc.subjectStrugglingeng
dc.subjectCopingeng
dc.titleThe relevance of timing of illness and death events in the household life cycle for coping outcomes in rural Uganda in the era of HIVen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2015-11-18T15:05:55Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright Amurwon et al. 2015
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0253-0
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY 4.0
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY 4.0