Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Tom
dc.contributor.authorLægreid, Per
dc.contributor.authorRykkja, Lise Hellebø
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-12T08:19:15Z
dc.date.available2018-01-12T08:19:15Z
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.identifier.issn1503-0946
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1956/17204
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the reform of the police in Norway from 2012 to 2015 using a qualitative analysis of central public reports and official documents leading up to the reform. These include the report from the official Inquiry Commission into the police response to the terrorist attacks of July 2011, a public commission established in 2012 to analyze challenges within the police and the resulting government proposal and parliamentary discussion that culminated in a final decision for a new police structure in 2015. While governance capacity and the need for a stronger emergency police was a main concern throughout the process the importance of governance legitimacy and to maintain a community police became more important at the end. The organizational thinking is explained based on a structural and institutional theoretical perspective. The analysis shows that cultural change, leadership change and structural change were prominent instruments for improving the police, but emphasized differently during the process. The arguments for the different instruments were not elaborated to any great extent by any of the actors and therefore took on a more symbolic flavor. The analysis demonstrates that political context, agenda settings, attention shifting and situational factors as well as path dependency are important drivers of the police reform.eng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherStein Rokkan Centre for Social Studieseng
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper; 9-2016eng
dc.titleReforming the Norwegian police between structure and culture. Community police or emergency police?eng
dc.typeWorking papereng
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200
dc.rights.holderCopyright Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies. All rights reserved.eng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
bora.peerreviewedNot peer reviewedeng


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record