Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPaulsen, Maria Lund
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Sophia Elisabeth Bardram
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Oliver
dc.contributor.authorMøller, Eva Friis
dc.contributor.authorStedmon, Colin A.
dc.contributor.authorJuul-Pedersen, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorMarkager, Stiig
dc.contributor.authorSejr, Mikael Kristian
dc.contributor.authorDelgado Huertas, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Aud
dc.contributor.authorMiddelboe, Mathias
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-09T08:51:44Z
dc.date.available2018-02-09T08:51:44Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-08
dc.identifier.issn2296-7745en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/17359
dc.description.abstractThe land-to-ocean flux of organic carbon is increasing in glacierized regions in response to increasing temperatures in the Arctic (Hood et al., 2015). In order to understand the response of the coastal ecosystem metabolism to the organic carbon input it is essential to determine the bioavailability of the different carbon sources in the system.We quantified the bacterial turnover of organic carbon in a high Arctic fjord system (Young Sound, NE Greenland) during the ice-free period (July-October 2014) and assessed the quality and quantity of the 3 major organic carbon sources; (1) local phytoplankton production (2) runoff from land-terminating glaciers and a lowland river and (3) inflow from the ocean shelf. We found that despite relatively low concentrations of DOC in the rivers, the bioavailability of the river–DOC was significantly higher than in the fjord, and characterized by high cell-specific bacterial production and low C:N ratios. In contrast, the DOC source entering via inflow of coastal shelf waters had high DOC concentrations with high C:N and low specific bacterial production. The phytoplankton production in the fjord could not sustain the bacterial carbon demand, but was still the major source of organic carbon for bacterial growth. We assessed the bacterial community composition and found that communities were specific for the different water types i.e., the bacterial community of the coastal inflow water could be traced mainly in the subsurface water, while the glacial river community strongly dominated the surface water in the fjord.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherFrontiersen_US
dc.relation.ispartof<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1956/17362" target="blank">Microbial dynamics in high latitude ecosystems. Responses to mixing, runoff and seasonal variation a rapidly changing environment</a>en_US
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subjectbacterial carbon demandeng
dc.subjectbacterial diversityeng
dc.subjectdissolved organic mattereng
dc.subjectrunoffeng
dc.subjectglacial meltwatereng
dc.subjecthigh arctic ecosystemseng
dc.subjectyoung soundeng
dc.titleCarbon Bioavailability in a High Arctic Fjord Influenced by Glacial Meltwater, NE Greenlanden_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2017 Paulsen, Nielsen, Müller, Møller, Stedmon, Juul-Pedersen, Markager, Sejr, Delgado Huertas, Larsen and Middelboe.en_US
dc.source.articlenumber176
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00176
dc.identifier.cristin1519644
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Marine Science
dc.source.404


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY