Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDolve, Maria Helena Meyer
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-21T12:06:46Z
dc.date.available2018-02-21T12:06:46Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-09
dc.date.submitted2017-12-08T23:00:03Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/17414
dc.description.abstractThis thesis attempts to estimate the effect of Chinese development aid on good governance in Sub-Saharan Africa over time. The motivation of this thesis is the growing importance of China as a donor, and the many assumptions about China`s negative effect on Governance. China follows the principles of non-interference and South-South cooperation their development aid allocations, and as a consequence, they are criticized for being motivated by their own economic and diplomatic interest, rather than the needs of recipients. Chinese aid is therefore characterized as “rough aid”. However, China discloses very little information of their aid allocations. As such, few quantitative empirical studies confront the various claims about Chinese rough aid. The research lab AidData has recently introduced a new open-source methodology for collecting data on Chinese aid, and created a database on Chinese development finance to Africa between 2000 and 2013. Now that data is available, it is both possible and needed to fill the gap in the literature. The analysis compares the effect of Chinese aid on good governance to the effect of Western aid. The thesis analyzes the effect within 29 Sub-Saharan African countries between 2000 and 2013, using panel data regression models. I find that China does not have a positive effect on good governance, but it is not possible to say with certainty that the general effect is negative either. I do not find any effect of Western aid on good governance over time. Additionally, I find no evidence that China harms the effectiveness of Western aid. The results are robust to several changes in the model specifications. The sharpest critique of Chinese aid is that is that it will diminish the effectiveness of Western aid, which in turn will lead to worse governance in recipient countries. The finding that China does not harm the effectiveness of Western aid can therefore have important implication on policy and the debate on Chinese “rough aid”. The findings suggest that the intensions of donors may not have any general impact on good governance, and that it might be other factors that determine the success of development aid.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherThe University of Bergeneng
dc.subjectdevelopment aideng
dc.subjectpanel dataeng
dc.subjectDACeng
dc.subjectSub-Saharan Africaeng
dc.subjectbistandeng
dc.subjectChinaeng
dc.subjectregressioneng
dc.subjectstyresetteng
dc.subjectKinesisk bistandeng
dc.subjectgood governanceeng
dc.subjectChinese aideng
dc.subjectutviklingeng
dc.titleRough Aid? An econometric analysis of Chinese development aid`s effect on good governance in Sub-Saharan Africaeng
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.date.updated2017-12-08T23:00:03Z
dc.rights.holderCopyright the author. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.degreeMasteroppgave
dc.description.localcodeSAMPOL350
dc.subject.nus731114eng
fs.subjectcodeSAMPOL350
fs.unitcode15-13-00


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel