Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKant, Leo
dc.contributor.authorNorman, Elisabeth
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-30T12:07:03Z
dc.date.available2019-08-30T12:07:03Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-19
dc.identifier.citationKant L, Norman E. You must be joking! Benign violations, power asymmetry, and humor in a broader social context. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10:1380eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1956/20751
dc.description.abstractViolated expectations can indeed be funny, as is acknowledged by incongruity theories of humor. According to the Benign Violation Theory (BVT), something is perceived as humorous when it hits the “sweet spot,” where there is not only a violation, but where the violation is also perceived as benign. The BVT specifies how psychological distance plays a central role in determining whether a certain event, joke, or other stimulus is perceived as benign or malign. In line with the aims of this research topic, we specifically address how this “sweet spot” may be influenced by social distance. This form of psychological distance has so far received less attention in the BVT than other forms of distance. First, we argue that the BVT needs to distinguish between different perspectives in a given situation, i.e., between the joke-teller and the joke-listener, and needs to account for the social distance between the two parties as well as between each of them and the joke. Second, we argue that the BVT needs to acknowledge possible power asymmetries between the two parties, and how asymmetries might influence the social distance between the joke-teller and joke-listener, as well as between each of these and the joke. Based on the assumption that power influences social distance, we argue that power asymmetry may explain certain disagreements over whether something is funny. Third, we suggest that cultural differences might influence shared perspectives on what is benign vs. malign, as well as power balance. Thus, cultural differences might have both a direct and an indirect influence on what is perceived as humorous. Finally, we discuss potential implications beyond humor, to other social situations with border zones. Close to the border, there is often disagreement concerning attempted violations of expectations and norms, and concerning their nature as benign or malign. This can for instance occur in sexual harassment, #MeToo, bullying, aggression, abusive supervision, destructive leadership, counterproductive work behavior, organizational citizenship behavior, parenting, and family relations. New understanding of border zones may thus be gained from BVT along with our proposed systematically mismatched judgments which parties could make about attempted benign violations.eng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherFrontierseng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0eng
dc.subjectbenign violation theoryeng
dc.subjectpsychological distanceeng
dc.subjectsocial distanceeng
dc.subjectcultureeng
dc.subjectpower asymmetryeng
dc.subjectdestructive leadershipeng
dc.subjectangereng
dc.subjecthumor perceptioneng
dc.titleYou must be joking! Benign violations, power asymmetry, and humor in a broader social contexteng
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.date.updated2019-07-31T22:40:56Z
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 The Author(s)eng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
bora.peerreviewedPeer reviewedeng
dc.type.documentJournal article
dc.identifier.cristinID1713571
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01380eng
dc.source.issn1664-1078eng
dc.relation.journalFrontiers in Psychology


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY