Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHalvorsen, Vera Baaslanden_US
dc.contributor.authorFenstad, Anne Marieen_US
dc.contributor.authorEngesæter, Lars B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNordsletten, Larsen_US
dc.contributor.authorOvergaard, Sørenen_US
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, Alma B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKärrholm, Johanen_US
dc.contributor.authorMOHADDES, MAZIARen_US
dc.contributor.authorEskelinen, Anttien_US
dc.contributor.authorMäkelä, Keijo T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRöhrl, Stephan Maximillianen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-17T13:26:40Z
dc.date.available2019-09-17T13:26:40Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-19
dc.PublishedHalvorsen VB, Fenstad F, Engesæter LB, Nordsletten L, Overgaard S, Pedersen AB, Kärrholm J, MOHADDES M, Eskelinen A, Mäkelä KT, Röhrl SM. Outcome of 881 total hip arthroplasties in 747 patients 21 years or younger: data from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) 1995-2016. Acta Orthopaedica. 2019;90(4):331-337.eng
dc.identifier.issn1745-3674
dc.identifier.issn1745-3682
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/20842
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose — The literature is scarce on the outcome of the youngest patients with total hip arthroplasties (THAs). We analyzed register data, revision risk, and related factors in patients 21 years or younger with THAs in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA). Patients and methods — We included all THA patients 21 years or younger reported during 1995 through 2016 to the Danish, Finnish, Norwegian, and Swedish hip arthroplasty registers and merged these into the NARA dataset. Primary outcome was any implant revision. Results — We identified 881 THAs in 747 patients. Mean age at primary surgery was 18 years (9–21). The indications for THA were pediatric hip diseases (33%), systemic inflammatory disease (23%), osteoarthritis (4%), avascular necrosis (12%), hip fracture sequelae (7%), and other diagnoses (21%). Unadjusted 10-year survival for all THAs was 86%. Comparison between indications showed no differences in survival. Uncemented implants were used most frequently. Survival for uncemented and cemented implants was the same adjusted for sex, indication, head size, and time period for primary surgery. Aseptic loosening was the main cause of revision. Interpretation — Both cemented and uncemented fixations seem to be a viable option in this age group, but with a lower implant survival than in older patient groups.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherTaylor & Franciseng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.titleOutcome of 881 total hip arthroplasties in 747 patients 21 years or younger: data from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) 1995-2016en_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2019-08-06T09:37:59Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 The Author(s).
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1615263
dc.identifier.cristin1707141
dc.source.journalActa Orthopaedica


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY