Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSahakyan, Musheghen_US
dc.contributor.authorLabori, Knut Jørgenen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrimavesi, Florianen_US
dc.contributor.authorSøreide, Kjetilen_US
dc.contributor.authorStättner, Stefanen_US
dc.contributor.authorEdwin, Bjørnen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-20T17:32:13Z
dc.date.available2019-11-20T17:32:13Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-13
dc.PublishedSahakyan M, Labori KJ, Primavesi, Søreide K, Stättner, Edwin B. Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery-where are we going?. European surgery. 2019;51(3):98-104eng
dc.identifier.issn1682-4016
dc.identifier.issn1682-8631
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/21023
dc.description.abstractBackground Introduced in the mid-1990s, minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS) developed slowly over the next two decades, and its real-life benefits remained unclear. Methods In this review, the current status and evidence on the most common types of MIPS, such as minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD), distal pancreatectomy, enucleation, and central pancreatectomy are presented. Results Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is the most frequently used procedure among these, and its indications are nowadays expanding. MIDP for benign and low-grade malignant tumors is advantageous compared to the open approach, suggesting less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stay, faster functional recovery, and better quality of life. The oncological adequacy of MIDP in pancreatic cancer is unclear, as no randomized trials have been published. In contrast, MIPD is a technically challenging procedure performed in a small number of centers and in a selected group of patients. Its use remains controversial, as conflicting data have been reported in the literature. Annual volume and learning curve seem to be the key determinants of safety in MIPD. Minimally invasive pancreatic enucleation and central pancreatectomy are less common. Although one randomized trial was published on minimally invasive vs. open central pancreatectomy, current evidence on these procedures is mostly based on retrospective, single-institution series clearly affected by selection bias and small sample size. Conclusion Well-designed prospective studies based on national registries are needed to expand knowledge on MIPS and determine its role in pancreatic surgery. To facilitate further development of MIPS, it has to integrate effectively with the outcome-improving effect of a dedicated pancreatic team.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherSpringereng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/eng
dc.subjectLaparoscopic surgeryeng
dc.subjectPancreatoduodenectomyeng
dc.subjectDistal pancreatectomyeng
dc.subjectEnucleationeng
dc.subjectCentral pancreatectomyeng
dc.titleMinimally invasive pancreatic surgery-where are we going?en_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2019-10-09T07:59:35Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 The Authors
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-019-0576-y
dc.identifier.cristin1702601
dc.source.journalEuropean surgery


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY