Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSandvik, Asle Makoto
dc.contributor.authorGjevestad, Espen Svendsen
dc.contributor.authorAabrekk, Einar
dc.contributor.authorØhman, Peter
dc.contributor.authorKjendlie, Per-Ludvik
dc.contributor.authorHystad, Sigurd William
dc.contributor.authorBartone, Paul T.
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Anita Lill
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Bjørn Helge
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-12T11:16:47Z
dc.date.available2020-05-12T11:16:47Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.PublishedSandvik AM, Gjevestad ES, Aabrekk E, Øhman, Kjendlie P, Hystad SW, Bartone PT, Hansen A, Johnsen BH. Physical fitness and psychological hardiness as predictors of parasympathetic control in response to stress: a Norwegian police simulator training study. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 2019eng
dc.identifier.issn1936-6469
dc.identifier.issn0882-0783
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/22198
dc.description.abstractThe individual biopsychological response to a specific stressor is the result of a complex interplay between many different factors including physiology, behavior, and personality. The goal of the present study was to explore the potential link between physical fitness, hardiness (Kobasa 1979), and the individual autonomic stress arousal experienced during a stressful police training situation (active shooter). Eighty-four police students participated in the study and were randomly assigned to either a high-stress or a low-stress testing condition. Hardiness was measured with the Dispositional Resilience Scale (Hystad et al. 2010). Physical fitness was assessed with V˙O2max . Parasympathetic control was measured using heart rate variability (HRV), i.e., the root mean square successive difference (RMSSD). Regression analysis showed that psychological hardiness had a negative main effect on change in parasympathetic activity from baseline to the testing phase (B = − 1.43, t = − 2.81, p = 0.007). Larger withdrawal of parasympathetic activation for high-hardy individuals in this phase of the study can be interpreted as an adaptive adjustment to the task set in front of them. A second regression analysis showed that both psychological hardiness (B = − 1.47, t = 3.68, p < 0.001) and physical fitness (B = 0.89, t = 2.85, p = 0.006) had significant main effects on change of parasympathetic activity entering the recovery phase of the study. Both regression coefficients were positive, with higher scores on hardiness and physical fitness predicting greater parasympathetic activation at stress offset. Overall, the results suggest that psychological hardiness and physical fitness may be important factors in how operational stress affects the individual in a police setting. Those high in hardiness and good physical form seem to be better able to recuperate and reset after a stressful incident, something that can be vital in an operational context. These results will be discussed in relation to the existing literature in the field.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherSpringereng
dc.titlePhysical fitness and psychological hardiness as predictors of parasympathetic control in response to stress: a Norwegian police simulator training studyeng
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2019-12-10T13:01:49Z
dc.description.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 Springereng
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09323-8
dc.identifier.cristin1688450
dc.source.journalJournal of Police and Criminal Psychology


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel