Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHartz, Ingeborgen_US
dc.contributor.authorSakshaug, Solveigen_US
dc.contributor.authorFuru, Karien_US
dc.contributor.authorEngeland, Andersen_US
dc.contributor.authorEggen, Anne Eliseen_US
dc.contributor.authorNjølstad, Ingeren_US
dc.contributor.authorSkurtveit, Svetlanaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-23T12:00:15Z
dc.date.available2008-05-23T12:00:15Z
dc.date.issued2007-12-05eng
dc.PublishedBMC Clinical Pharmacology 2007, 7:14en
dc.identifier.issn1472-6904
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/2674
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this paper was to test the goodness of fit of the Attitude – Social influence – self-Efficacy (ASE) model in explaining schoolchildren's intentions to eat fruit and their actual fruit intake in Austria, Norway and Spain; to assess how well the model could explain the observed variance in intention to eat fruit and in reported fruit intake and to investigate whether the same model would fit data from all three countries. Methods: Samples consisted of schoolchildren from three of the countries participating in the cross-sectional part of the Pro Children project. Sample size varied from 991 in Austria to 1297 in Spain. Mean age ranged from 11.3 to 11.4 years. The initial model was designed using items and constructs from the Pro Children study. Factor analysis was conducted to test the structure of the measures in the model. The Norwegian sample was used to test the latent variable structure, to make a preliminary assessment of model fit, and to modify the model to increase goodness of fit with the data. The original and modified models were then applied to the Austrian and Spanish samples. All model analyses were carried out using structural equation modelling techniques. Results: The ASE-model fitted the Norwegian and Spanish data well. For Austria, a slightly more complex model was needed. For this reason multi-sample analysis to test equality in factor structure and loadings across countries could not be used. The models explained between 51% and 69% of the variance in intention to eat fruit, and 27% to 38% of the variance in reported fruit intake. Conclusion: Structural equation modelling showed that a rather parsimonious model was useful in explaining the variation in fruit intake of 11-year-old schoolchildren in Norway and Spain. For Austria, more modifications were needed to fit the data.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.titleAspects of statin prescribing in Norwegian counties with high, average and low statin consumption – an individual-level prescription database studyen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6904-7-14
dc.identifier.cristin368123


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel