Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTelford, Richard J.eng
dc.contributor.authorHeegaard, Einareng
dc.contributor.authorBirks, Harry John Betteleyeng
dc.date.accessioned2004-07-30T09:54:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2004-08-03T12:57:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2004-08-26T11:58:44Z
dc.date.available2004-07-30T09:54:49Z
dc.date.available2004-08-03T12:57:51Z
dc.date.available2004-08-26T11:58:44Z
dc.date.issued2004eng
dc.PublishedThe Holocene 2004 14(2): 296–298en
dc.identifier.issn0959-6836en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/414
dc.description.abstractIntercept-based methods of generating a point estimate of a calibrated radiocarbon date are very popular, but exhibit undesirable behaviour. They are highly sensitive to the mean of the radiocarbon date and to adjustments of the calibration curve. Other methods give more stable results. The weighted average of the probability distribution function is recommended as the best central-point estimate, but more consideration should be given to using the full probability distribution rather than a point estimate in developing agedepth models.en_US
dc.format.extent16780 byteseng
dc.format.extent134572 byteseng
dc.format.extent166 byteseng
dc.format.mimetypetext/plaineng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfeng
dc.format.mimetypetext/plaineng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherArnold Publishersen_US
dc.subjectRadiocarbon datingeng
dc.subjectCalibrationeng
dc.subjectIntercepteng
dc.subjectWeighted averageeng
dc.subjectHoloceneeng
dc.subjectMethodologyeng
dc.titleThe intercept is a poor estimate of a calibrated radiocarbon ageen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2004 Arnolden_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1191/0959683604hl707fa


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel