Satisfaction with oral health and associated factors in Sweden and Norway – cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives
Abstract
Background:
Oral health is defined as a broader concept than oral disease, concerning individuals’ optimal
functioning, social and psychological wellbeing. Thus, oral disease affects oral health by its
functional, psychological and social consequences for the individual. There seems to be a
need to assess information about self-reported oral health for such measures to be valid
supplements for the conventional clinical measures. Aims:
The main objective of this thesis was to contribute to the validation of a single global measure
of oral health in the context of younger and older age groups in Sweden and Norway.
Specifically, this study assessed the level of oral health satisfaction in younger and older
Swedish age groups, examined associations of self reported oral satisfaction with socio
demographic, clinical and non-clinical variables across 65-year-olds in Norway and Sweden
and examined changes and predictors of changes in oral health satisfaction of a cohort of
Swedes as they aged from 50 to 65 yr.
Method:
The papers of the present thesis are based upon three structured questionnaire surveys. Survey
I applies to paper I and was conducted in 2006 involving a census of 19-year-olds attending
dental clinics in Örebro and Östergötland. Data were collected by questionnaires and an oral
clinical examination. The second survey, (Survey II) is a prospective cohort study initiated in
1992 among all 50-year-olds (born 1942) resident in Örebro and Östergötland. Survey II
applies to Papers II and III. Data were collected in 1992, 1997, 2002 and 2007 at ages 50, 55,
60 and 65 yrs, respectively. The survey started as a collaborative project and the counties were chosen by convenience and not with the purpose of being representative for Sweden as a
whole. Survey III was conducted in 2007 among a census of the 1942 cohort currently
residing in three counties of Norway, Hordaland, Sogn & Fjordane and Nordland. The
Norwegian counties were chosen purposively to represent not only the rural and urban parts
of the country, but also variability in oral conditions and dental service offered. Survey II and
III were based on a similar questionnaire. Results:
The aim of Paper I (based on Survey I) was to investigate clinical- and self-perceived oral
health indicators among 19-year-olds, using a single global question on oral health and one
clinical indicator in terms of DSa. Four subscales (function, knowledge, quality of life and
social) were used to identify predictors for self perceived oral health. The results revealed that
87,5% of the 19 yr old participants (n=3,658) was satisfied with their teeth. Females reported
more serious problems than males in the social and quality of life dimensions and responders
from Östergötland showed better knowledge about oral disease than responders from Örebro
(94,4% versus 90,1%). The strongest predictors of satisfaction with oral health were social
aspects and quality of life. Statistically significant two-way interactions occurred between
county and knowledge and between county and quality of life. In Östergötland knowledge
varied systematically with satisfaction, whereas function did not and in Örebro the opposite
result was found. Thus, some or good knowledge was more strongly associated with
satisfaction in Östergötland than in Örebro, whereas good function was more strongly
associated with satisfaction in Örebro.
The aim of paper II (based on Survey II and III) was to assess the prevalence of self-reported
oral health satisfaction and to examine its relationship with sociodemographic-, behavioural and subjective oral health indicators. In addition, this study examined the extent to which the
abovementioned relationships were consistent across Sweden and Norway as reported by 65-
year-olds. A total of 76.8% of the Swedish and 76.5% of the Norwegian participants were
satisfied with their oral health. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that subjects
who perceived bad general health, smoked daily, had missing teeth, experienced toothache,
had problems with chewing, bad breath and oral impacts were less likely than their
counterparts in the opposite group to be satisfied with their oral health status. The
corresponding odds ratios ranged from 0.08 (problems chewing) to 0.2 (oral impact). No
statistically significant two-way interactions occurred and the model explained 46% of the
variance in oral health satisfaction across the countries (45% in Sweden and 47% in Norway).
The aim of paper III (based on Survey II) was to assess the stability or change of self-reported
satisfaction with teeth in subjects as they age from 50 to 65 and to assess the impacts of
socio-demographic, clinical and non-clinical oral health-related factors on tooth satisfaction
throughout that period. The result showed that altogether, 63% females and 66% males
remained satisfied with their teeth between the ages of 50 and 65. The corresponding figures,
with respect to dissatisfaction, were 7% and 6%. GEE models revealed a decline in the odds
of being satisfied with advancing age, and this was particularly important in subjects with
lower education, tooth loss and in smokers. Remaining all teeth and the absence of chewing
problems were the strongest predictors of satisfaction with teeth between ages 50 and 65. Conclusions and implications:
A single global question on oral health satisfaction was applicable in terms of having
acceptable psychometric properties in the context of younger and older age groups across
Sweden and Norway. This supports the notion that to ascertain information about patients’ oral health, both self-reported oral health measures and conventional clinical measures are
needed. Such self-reports can be administered in different ways. To ask a single global oral
health question (and register the answer) at the time when patients undergo their regular
examination is inexpensive and straightforward. The implementation of such a question is a
technical matter for the care provider where there are different possibilities to introduce it
directly into the medical record or in adhering it in medical history or risk group registration.
Has part(s)
Paper I: Swedish Dental Journal 32(2), Ekbäck, G.; Åstrøm, A. N.; Klock, K.; Ordell, S.; Unell, L., Self-perceived oral health among 19-year-olds in two Swedish counties, pp. 83–93. Reproduced with permission. Published version. Paper II: Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 67(4), Ekbäck, G.; Åstrøm, A. N.; Klock, K.; Ordell, S.; Unell, L., Variation in subjective oral health indicators of 65-year-olds in Norway and Sweden, pp. 222-232. Copyright 2009 Informa UK. Full text not available in BORA due to publisher restrictions. Paper III: European Journal of Oral Sciences 118(1), Ekbäck, G.; Åstrøm, A. N.; Klock, K.; Ordell, S.; Unell, L., Satisfaction with teeth and life course predictors: a prospective study of a Swedish 1942 birth cohort, pp. 66–74. Copyright 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation 2010 European Journal of Oral Sciences. Full text not available in BORA due to publisher restrictions. The published version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00702.x
Publisher
The University of BergenCollections
Copyright the author. All rights reserved
The author
The author