Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDale, Håvarden_US
dc.contributor.authorSkråmm, Ingeen_US
dc.contributor.authorLøwer, Hege Lineen_US
dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Hanne M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEspehaug, Birgitteen_US
dc.contributor.authorFurnes, Oveen_US
dc.contributor.authorSkjeldestad, Finn Egilen_US
dc.contributor.authorHavelin, Leif Ivaren_US
dc.contributor.authorEngesæter, Lars B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-08T15:53:57Z
dc.date.available2013-10-08T15:53:57Z
dc.date.issued2011-12eng
dc.PublishedActa Orthopaedica 82(6): 646–654eng
dc.identifier.issn1745-3674
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/7372
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess incidence of and risk factors for infection after hip arthroplasty in data from 3 national health registries. We investigated differences in risk patterns between surgical site infection (SSI) and revision due to infection after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA). Materials and methods: This observational study was based on prospective data from 2005–2009 on primary THAs and HAs from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR), the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (NHFR), and the Norwegian Surveillance System for Healthcare–Associated Infections (NOIS). The Norwegian Patient Register (NPR) was used for evaluation of case reporting. Cox regression analyses were performed with revision due to infection as endpoint for data from the NAR and the NHFR, and with SSI as the endpoint for data from the NOIS. Results: The 1–year incidence of SSI in the NOIS was 3.0% after THA (167/5,540) and 7.3% after HA (103/1,416). The 1–year incidence of revision due to infection was 0.7% for THAs in the NAR (182/24,512) and 1.5% for HAs in the NHFR (128/8,262). Risk factors for SSI after THA were advanced age, ASA class higher than 2, and short duration of surgery. For THA, the risk factors for revision due to infection were male sex, advanced age, ASA class higher than 1, emergency surgery, uncemented fixation, and a National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) risk index of 2 or more. For HAs inserted after fracture, age less than 60 and short duration of surgery were risk factors of revision due to infection. Interpretation: The incidences of SSI and revision due to infection after primary hip replacements in Norway are similar to those in other countries. There may be differences in risk pattern between SSI and revision due to infection after arthroplasty. The risk patterns for revision due to infection appear to be different for HA and THA.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherInforma Healthcareeng
dc.relation.ispartof<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1956/7388" target="blank">Infection after primary hip arthroplasty. Epidemiology, time trends and risk factors in data from national health registers</a>eng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NCeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/eng
dc.titleInfection after primary hip arthroplasty. A comparison of 3 Norwegian health registersen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2011 Informa Healthcare. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.636671
dc.identifier.cristin881974
dc.source.journalActa Orthopaedica
dc.source.4082
dc.source.146
dc.source.pagenumber646-654


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC