Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMatre, Kjellen_US
dc.contributor.authorHavelin, Leif Ivaren_US
dc.contributor.authorGjertsen, Jan-Eriken_US
dc.contributor.authorEspehaug, Birgitteen_US
dc.contributor.authorFevang, Jonas Melingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-13T09:09:50Z
dc.date.available2013-12-13T09:09:50Z
dc.date.issued2013-04-01eng
dc.identifier.issn0009-921X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/7600
dc.description.abstractBackground Sliding hip screws (SHSs) and intramedullary (IM) nails are well-documented implants for simple two-part intertrochanteric fractures; however, there is no consensus regarding which type of implant is better. Questions/purposes We asked whether patients with simple two-part intertrochanteric fractures treated with IM nailing had (1) a lower reoperation rate and (2) less pain and better quality of life than patients treated with SHSs.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherSpringereng
dc.relation.ispartof<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1956/7583" target="blank">Treatment of trochanteric and subtrochanteric hip fractures: Sliding hip screw or intramedullary nail?</a>eng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/eng
dc.titleIntramedullary Nails Result in More Reoperations Than Sliding Hip Screws in Two-part Intertrochanteric Fracturesen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2728-2
dc.identifier.cristin988845
dc.source.journalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
dc.source.40471
dc.source.144
dc.source.pagenumber1379-1386


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY