Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUlesido, Fekadu Masseboeng
dc.contributor.authorLindtjørn, Bernteng
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-18T08:29:21Z
dc.date.available2014-02-18T08:29:21Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-12eng
dc.identifier.citationMalaria Journal 12: 319eng
dc.identifier.issn1475-2875eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1956/7800
dc.description.abstract<p>Background: Screening of houses might have impact on density of indoor host-seeking Anopheles mosquitoes. A randomized trial of screening windows and doors with metal mesh, and closing openings on eves and walls by mud was conducted to assess if reduce indoor densities of biting mosquitoes.</p><p>Methods: Mosquitoes were collected in forty houses using Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC) light traps biweekly in March and April 2011. A randomization of houses into control and intervention groups was done based on the baseline data. Windows and doors of 20 houses were screened by metal mesh, and openings on the walls and eves closed by mud and the rest 20 houses were used as control group. Mosquitoes were collected biweekly in October and November 2011 from both control and intervention houses. A Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) with a negative binomial error distribution was used to account for over dispersion of Anopheles arabiensis and culicine counts and repeated catches made in the same house.</p><p>Results: Screening doors and windows, and closing openings on eves and wall by mud reduced the overall indoor densities of An. arabiensis by 40%. The effect of screenings pronounced on unfed An. arabiensis by resulting 42% reduction in houses with interventions. The total costs for screening windows and doors, and to close openings on the eves and walls by mud was 7.34 USD per house.</p><p>Conclusion: Screening houses reduced indoor density of An. arabiensis, and it was cheap and can easily incorporated into malaria vector strategies by local communities, but improving doors and windows fitness for screening should be considered during house construction to increase the efficacy of screenings.</p>eng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.relation.ispartof<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1956/15638" target="_blank">Malaria vectors in southern Ethiopia. Some challenges and opportunities for vector control</a>
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/eng
dc.subjectAnopheles arabiensiseng
dc.subjectScreening doors and windowseng
dc.subjectIndoor densityeng
dc.subjectMetal mesheng
dc.titleThe effect of screening doors and windows on indoor density of Anopheles arabiensis in south-west Ethiopia: a randomized trialeng
dc.typePeer reviewedeng
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.date.updated2013-10-15T04:08:03Z
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2013 Massebo and Lindtjørn; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rights.holderFekadu Massebo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.eng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
bora.peerreviewedPeer reviewedeng
bora.journalTitleMalaria Journaleng
bibo.volume12eng
bibo.issue319eng
bibo.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-319eng
dc.identifier.cristinID1071833eng
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1475-2875-12-319
dcterms.isPartOfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1956/15638


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY