Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEchoka, Elizabethen_US
dc.contributor.authorKombe, Yerien_US
dc.contributor.authorDubourg, Dominiqueen_US
dc.contributor.authorMakokha, Anselimoen_US
dc.contributor.authorEvjen-Olsen, Bjørgen_US
dc.contributor.authorMwangi, Mosesen_US
dc.contributor.authorByskov, Jensen_US
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Øystein Evjenen_US
dc.contributor.authorMutisya, Richarden_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-11T14:19:17Z
dc.date.available2014-07-11T14:19:17Z
dc.date.issued2013-03-25eng
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/8145
dc.description.abstractBackground: The knowledge on emergency obstetric care (EmOC) is limited in Kenya, where only partial data from sub-national studies exist. The EmOC process indicators have also not been integrated into routine health management information system to monitor progress in safe motherhood interventions both at national and lower levels of the health system. In a country with a high maternal mortality burden, the implication is that decision makers are unaware of the extent of need for life-saving care and, therefore, where to intervene. The objective of the study was to assess the actual existence and functionality of EmOC services at district level. Methods: This was a facility-based cross-sectional study. Data were collected from 40 health facilities offering delivery services in Malindi District, Kenya. Data presented are part of the “Response to accountable priority setting for trust in health systems” (REACT) study, in which EmOC was one of the service areas selected to assess fairness and legitimacy of priority setting in health care. The main outcome measures in this study were the number of facilities providing EmOC, their geographical distribution, and caesarean section rates in relation to World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. Results: Among the 40 facilities assessed, 29 were government owned, seven were private and four were voluntary organisations. The ratio of EmOC facilities to population size was met (6.2/500,000), compared to the recommended 5/500,000. However, using the strict WHO definition, none of the facilities met the EmOC requirements, since assisted delivery, by vacuum or forceps was not provided in any facility. Rural–urban inequities in geographical distribution of facilities were observed. The facilities were not providing sufficient life-saving care as measured by caesarean section rates, which were below recommended levels (3.7% in 2008 and 4.5% in 2009). The rates were lower in the rural than in urban areas (2.1% vs. 6.8%; p < 0.001 ) in 2008 and (2.7% vs. 7.7%; p < 0.001) in 2009. Conclusions: The gaps in existence and functionality of EmOC services revealed in this study may point to the health system conditions contributing to lack of improvements in maternal survival in Kenya. As such, the findings bear considerable implications for policy and local priority setting.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/eng
dc.subjectKenyaeng
dc.subjectMaternal healtheng
dc.subjectEmergency obstetric careeng
dc.subjectLife-savingeng
dc.titleExistence and functionality of emergency obstetric care services at district level in Kenya: theoretical coverage versus realityen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2013-08-23T08:52:43Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderElizabeth Echoka et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2013 Echoka et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.source.articlenumber113
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-113
dc.identifier.cristin1037423
dc.source.journalBMC Health Services Research
dc.source.4013


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution CC BY
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution CC BY