Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNorheim, Ole Frithjofen_US
dc.contributor.authorBaltussen, Roben_US
dc.contributor.authorJohri, Miraen_US
dc.contributor.authorChisholm, Danen_US
dc.contributor.authorNord, Eriken_US
dc.contributor.authorBrock, Dan W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCarlsson, Peren_US
dc.contributor.authorCookson, Richarden_US
dc.contributor.authorDaniels, Normanen_US
dc.contributor.authorDanis, Marionen_US
dc.contributor.authorFleurbaey, Marcen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohansson, Kjell Arneen_US
dc.contributor.authorKapiriri, Lydiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLittlejohns, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorMbeeli, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorRao, Krishna D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEdejer, Tessa Tan-Torresen_US
dc.contributor.authorWikler, Danen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-29T11:48:34Z
dc.date.available2014-09-29T11:48:34Z
dc.date.issued2014-08-29eng
dc.identifier.issn1478-7547
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/8574
dc.description.abstractThis Guidance for Priority Setting in Health Care (GPS-Health), initiated by the World Health Organization, offers a comprehensive map of equity criteria that are relevant to health care priority setting and should be considered in addition to cost-effectiveness analysis. The guidance, in the form of a checklist, is especially targeted at decision makers who set priorities at national and sub-national levels, and those who interpret findings from cost-effectiveness analysis. It is also targeted at researchers conducting cost-effectiveness analysis to improve reporting of their results in the light of these other criteria. The guidance was develop through a series of expert consultation meetings and involved three steps: i) methods and normative concepts were identified through a systematic review; ii) the review findings were critically assessed in the expert consultation meetings which resulted in a draft checklist of normative criteria; iii) the checklist was validated though an extensive hearing process with input from a range of relevant stakeholders. The GPS-Health incorporates criteria related to the disease an intervention targets (severity of disease, capacity to benefit, and past health loss); characteristics of social groups an intervention targets (socioeconomic status, area of living, gender; race, ethnicity, religion and sexual orientation); and non-health consequences of an intervention (financial protection, economic productivity, and care for others).en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0eng
dc.subjectPriority settingeng
dc.subjectResource allocationeng
dc.subjectCost-effectivenesseng
dc.subjectEquityeng
dc.subjectPopulation healtheng
dc.titleGuidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysisen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2014-09-22T23:03:49Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2014 Norheim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rights.holderOle F Norheim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.source.articlenumber18
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-12-18
dc.identifier.cristin1175720
dc.source.journalCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
dc.source.4012


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY