Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorChinkhumba, Jobibaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Allegri, Manuelaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMuula, Adamson S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRobberstad, Bjarneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-09T12:21:04Z
dc.date.available2014-10-09T12:21:04Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-28eng
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/8624
dc.description.abstractBackground: Facility-based delivery has gained traction as a key strategy for reducing maternal and perinatal mortality in developing countries. However, robust evidence of impact of place of delivery on maternal and perinatal mortality is lacking. We aimed to estimate the risk of maternal and perinatal mortality by place of delivery in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of population-based cohort studies reporting on risk of maternal or perinatal mortality at the individual level by place of delivery in sub-Saharan Africa. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. Outcomes were summarized in pooled analyses using fixed and random effects models. We calculated attributable risk percentage reduction in mortality to estimate exposure effect. We report mortality ratios, crude odds ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals. Results: We found 9 population-based cohort studies: 6 reporting on perinatal and 3 on maternal mortality. The mean study quality score was 10 out of 15 points. Control for confounders varied between the studies. A total of 36,772 pregnancy episodes were included in the analyses. Overall, perinatal mortality is 21% higher for home compared to facility-based deliveries, but the difference is only significant when produced with a fixed effects model (OR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02-1.46) and not when produced by a random effects model (OR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.79-1.84). Under best settings, up to 14 perinatal deaths might be averted per 1000 births if the women delivered at facilities instead of homes. We found significantly increased risk of maternal mortality for facility-based compared to home deliveries (OR 2.29, 95% CI: 1.58-3.31), precluding estimates of attributable risk fraction. Conclusion: Evaluating the impact of facility-based delivery strategy on maternal and perinatal mortality using population-based studies is complicated by selection bias and poor control of confounders. Studies that pool data at an individual level may overcome some of these problems and provide better estimates of relative effectiveness of place of delivery in the region.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.relation.ispartof<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/1956/17491" target="blank"> Economic analysis of Resultsbased financing in Malawi. Strengthening the evidence base for alternative maternal and perinatal Healthcare funding</a>
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0eng
dc.subjectMaternal and perinatal mortality riskeng
dc.subjectPlace of deliveryeng
dc.subjectSub-Saharan Africaeng
dc.titleMaternal and perinatal mortality by place of delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis of population-based cohort studiesen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2014-10-08T19:04:07Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2014 Chinkhumba et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rights.holderJobiba Chinkhumba et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.source.articlenumber1014
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1014
dc.identifier.cristin1215235
dc.source.journalBMC Public Health
dc.source.4014


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY