Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHaaland, Øystein Ariansenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLindemark, Frodeen_US
dc.contributor.authorFlaatten, Hansen_US
dc.contributor.authorKvåle, Reidaren_US
dc.contributor.authorJohansson, Kjell Arneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-04T10:17:35Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-04T10:20:58Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-10T12:53:01Z
dc.date.available2014-12-10T12:53:01Z
dc.date.issued2014-05-12eng
dc.identifier.issn0001-5172
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/8891
dc.description.abstractBackground Mortality prediction is important in intensive care. The Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II is a tool for predicting such mortality. However, the original SAPS II is poorly calibrated to current intensive care unit (ICU) populations because it draws on data, which is more than 20 years old. We aimed to improve the calibration of SAPS II using data from the Norwegian Intensive Care Registry (NIR). This is the first recalibration of SAPS II for Nordic data. Methods A first-level customization was applied to improve calibration of the original SAPS II model (Model A). NIR data used covered more than 90% of adult patients admitted to ICUs in Norway from 2008 to 2010 (n = 30712). Results The modified SAPS II, Model B, outperformed the original Model A with respect to calibration. Model B gave more accurate predictions of mortality than Model A (Hosmer–Lemeshow's C: 22.01 vs. 689.07; Brier score: 0.120 vs. 0.131; Cox's calibration regression: α = −0.093 vs. −0.747, β = 0.921 vs. 0.735, (α|β = 1) = −0.009 vs. −0.630). The standardized mortality ratio was 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.70–0.76] for Model A and 0.99 (95% CI of 0.95–1.04) for Model B. Discrimination was good for both models (area under receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.83 for both models). Conclusions As expected, Model B is better calibrated than Model A, and both models have similar uniformity of fit and equal discrimination. Introducing Model B into Norwegian ICUs may improve precision in decision-making. Units will have a more realistic benchmark for the assessment of ICU performance. Mortality risk estimates from Model B are better than previous SAPS II estimates have been.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherWileyeng
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NCeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/eng
dc.titleA calibration study of SAPS II with Norwegian intensive care registry dataen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2014-12-04T10:17:35Zen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2014 The Authors
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12327
dc.identifier.cristin1148595
dc.source.journalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
dc.source.4058
dc.source.146
dc.source.pagenumber701-708


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC