Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Eriken_US
dc.contributor.authorKroken, Rune A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWentzel-Larsen, Toreen_US
dc.contributor.authorJørgensen, Hugo A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-16T08:18:45Z
dc.date.available2015-01-16T08:18:45Z
dc.date.issued2010-03-24eng
dc.identifier.issn1471-244X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1956/9174
dc.description.abstractBackground: No clear recommendations exist regarding which antipsychotic drug should be prescribed first for a patient suffering from psychosis. The primary aims of this naturalistic study were to assess the head-to-head effectiveness of first-line second-generation antipsychotics with regards to time until drug discontinuation, duration of index admission, time until readmission, change of psychopathology scores and tolerability outcomes. Methods: Patients ≥ 18 years of age admitted to the emergency ward for symptoms of psychosis were consecutively randomized to risperidone (n = 53), olanzapine (n = 52), quetiapine (n = 50), or ziprasidone (n = 58), and followed for up to 2 years. Results: A total of 213 patients were included, of which 68% were males. The sample represented a diverse population suffering from psychosis. At admittance the mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score was 74 points and 44% were antipsychotic drug naïve. The primary intention-to-treat analyses revealed no substantial differences between the drugs regarding the times until discontinuation of initial drug, until discharge from index admission, or until readmission. Quetiapine was superior to risperidone and olanzapine in reducing the PANSS total score and the positive subscore. Quetiapine was superior to the other drugs in decreasing the PANSS general psychopathology subscore; in decreasing the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness scale score (CGI-S); and in increasing the Global Assessment of Functioning - Split version, Functions scale score (GAF-F). Ziprasidone was superior to risperidone in decreasing the PANSS positive symptoms subscore and the CGI-S score, and in increasing the GAF-F score. The drugs performed equally with regards to most tolerability outcomes except a higher increase of hip-circumference per day for olanzapine compared to risperidone, and more galactorrhoea for risperidone compared to the other groups. Conclusions: Quetiapine appears to be a good starting drug candidate in this sample of patients admitted to hospital for symptoms of psychosis.en_US
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherBioMed Centraleng
dc.rightsAttribution CC BYeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/eng
dc.titleEffectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics: a naturalistic, randomized comparison of olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidoneen_US
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2013-08-28T16:33:04Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderErik Johnsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2010 Johnsen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.source.articlenumber26
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244x-10-26
dc.identifier.cristin339459
dc.source.journalBMC Psychiatry
dc.source.4010


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution CC BY
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution CC BY