Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFazlikhani, Hamed
dc.contributor.authorAagotnes, Synne
dc.contributor.authorRefvem, Marte
dc.contributor.authorHamilton-Wright, James
dc.contributor.authorBell, Rebecca E.
dc.contributor.authorFossen, Haakon
dc.contributor.authorGawthorpe, Rob
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Christopher A.-L.
dc.contributor.authorRotevatn, Atle
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-18T11:54:01Z
dc.date.available2021-03-18T11:54:01Z
dc.date.created2020-11-28T13:22:40Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn0950-091X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2734188
dc.description.abstractIn regions experiencing multiple phases of extension, rift‐related strain can vary along and across the basin during and between each phase, and the location of maximum extension can differ between the rift phase. Despite having a general understanding of multiphase rift kinematics, it remains unclear why the rift axis migrates between extension episodes. The role pre‐existing structures play in influencing fault and basin geometries during later rifting events is also poorly understood. We study the Stord Basin, northern North Sea, a location characterised by strain migration between two rift episodes. To reveal and quantify the rift kinematics, we interpreted a dense grid of 2D seismic reflection profiles, produced time‐structure and isochore (thickness) maps, collected quantitative fault kinematic data and calculated the amount of extension (β‐factor). Our results show that the locations of basin‐bounding fault systems were controlled by pre‐existing crustal‐scale shear zones. Within the basin, Permo‐Triassic Rift Phase 1 (RP1) faults mainly developed orthogonal to the E‐W extension direction. Rift faults control the locus of syn‐RP1 deposition, whilst during the inter‐rift stage, areas of clastic wedge progradation are more important in controlling sediment thickness trends. The calculated amount of RP1 extension (β‐factor) for the Stord Basin is up to β = 1.55 (±10%, 55% extension). During the subsequent Middle Jurassic‐Early Cretaceous Rift Phase 2 (RP2), however, strain localised to the west along the present axis of the South Viking Graben, with the Stord Basin being almost completely abandoned. Rift axis migration during RP2 is interpreted to be related to changes in lithospheric strength profile, possibly related to the ultraslow extension (<1 mm/year during RP1), the long period of tectonic quiescence (ca. 50 myr) between RP1 and RP2 and possible underplating. Our results highlight the very heterogeneous nature of temporal and lateral strain migration during and between extension phases within a single rift basin.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleStrain migration during multiphase extension, Stord Basin, northern North Sea riften_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authors.en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bre.12522
dc.identifier.cristin1853646
dc.source.journalBasin Researchen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1474-1496en_US
dc.identifier.citationBasin Research. 2021, 33 (2), 1474-1496.en_US
dc.source.volume33en_US
dc.source.issue2en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal