Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMarquardt, Lynn Anne
dc.contributor.authorKusztrits, Isabella
dc.contributor.authorCraven, Alexander R.
dc.contributor.authorHugdahl, Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorSpecht, Karsten
dc.contributor.authorHirnstein, Marco
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-21T14:48:00Z
dc.date.available2021-05-21T14:48:00Z
dc.date.created2020-11-30T12:55:04Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.PublishedEuropean Journal of Neuroscience. 2020, 1-11.
dc.identifier.issn0953-816X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2756086
dc.description.abstractThe underlying neural mechanisms of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), especially beyond the primary motor cortex, remain unclear. Several studies examined tDCS effects on either functional activity, neurotransmitters or behavior but few investigated those aspects together to reveal how the brain responds to tDCS. The objective is to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of tDCS using a multimodal approach that extends from behavioral to neurotransmitter levels of explanation. Thirty-two healthy participants performed an auditory dichotic listening task at two visits, one session with sham and one session with real tDCS (2 mA) while simultaneously undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The anode and cathode were placed over the left temporo-parietal cortex (TPC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, respectively. Before and after simultaneous dichotic listening/fMRI/tDCS, combined glutamate and glutamine (Glx) and myo-inositol levels were assessed in the stimulated areas. While fMRI and dichotic listening showed expected functional activity and behavioral effects, neither method demonstrated differences between real and sham stimulation. Glx only showed a statistical trend towards higher levels after real tDCS in both stimulated brain areas. There were no significant correlations between behavior and Glx. Despite a reasonable sample size, electrical field strength, and replication of behavioral and functional activity results, tDCS had little to no effect on dichotic listening, Glx, and functional activity. The study emphasizes that findings about the underlying neural mechanisms of the primary motor cortex cannot simply be generalized to other brain areas. Particularly, the TPC might be less sensitive to tDCS. Moreover, the study demonstrates the general feasibility of multimodal approaches.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA multimodal study of the effects of tDCS on dorsolateral prefrontal and temporo-parietal areas during dichotic listeningen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authors.en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ejn.14932
dc.identifier.cristin1854105
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal of Neuroscienceen_US
dc.source.pagenumber449-459en_US
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Neuroscience. 2021, 53 (2), 449-459en_US
dc.source.volume53en_US
dc.source.issue2en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal