Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBertholet, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorAnastasi, Gail
dc.contributor.authorNoble, David
dc.contributor.authorBel, Arjan
dc.contributor.authorvan Leeuwen, Ruud
dc.contributor.authorRoggen, Toon
dc.contributor.authorDuchateau, Michael
dc.contributor.authorPilskog, Sara
dc.contributor.authorGaribaldi, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorTilly, Nina
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Mollá, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorBonaque, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorOelfke, Uwe
dc.contributor.authorAznar, Marianne C.
dc.contributor.authorHeijmen, Ben J.M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-24T06:59:01Z
dc.date.available2021-06-24T06:59:01Z
dc.date.created2021-02-10T16:50:08Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0167-8140
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2760991
dc.description.abstractPurpose The POP-ART RT study aims to determine to what extent and how intrafractional real-time respiratory motion management (RRMM), and plan adaptation for interfractional anatomical changes (ART) are used in clinical practice and to understand barriers to implementation. Here we report on part II: ART using more than one plan per target per treatment course. Materials and methods A questionnaire on the current practice of ART, wishes for expansion or implementation, and barriers to implementation was distributed worldwide. Four types of ART were discriminated: daily online replanning, online plan library, protocolled offline replanning (all three based on a protocol), and ad-hoc offline replanning. Results The questionnaire was completed by 177 centres from 40 countries. ART was used by 61% of respondents (31% with protocol) for a median (range) of 3 (1–8) tumour sites. CBCT/MVCT was the main imaging modality except for online daily replanning (11 users) where 10 users used MR. Two thirds of respondents wished to implement ART for a new tumour site; 40% of these had plans to do it in the next 2 years. Human/material resources and technical limitations were the main barriers to further use and implementation. Conclusions ART was used for a broad range of tumour sites, mainly with ad-hoc offline replanning and for a median of 3 tumour sites. There was a large interest in implementing ART for more tumour sites, mainly limited by human/material resources and technical limitations. Daily online replanning was primarily performed on MR-linacs.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePatterns of practice for adaptive and real-time radiation therapy (POP-ART RT) part II: Offline and online plan adaption for interfractional changesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authors.en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.radonc.2020.06.017
dc.identifier.cristin1888649
dc.source.journalRadiotherapy and Oncologyen_US
dc.source.pagenumber88-96en_US
dc.identifier.citationRadiotherapy and Oncology. 2020, 153, 88-96.en_US
dc.source.volume153en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal