Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorShang, Guowen
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-09T11:39:20Z
dc.date.available2021-07-09T11:39:20Z
dc.date.created2021-02-18T09:56:26Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2246-8838
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2764053
dc.description.abstractLinguistic landscape (LL) is a thriving strand of inquiry in sociolinguistics to interpret the multilingual representations in public space. Taking city residents as LL readers, this paper examines their opinions about the urban multilingualism visible in Eastern China’s big cities in order to find out how the language displays are perceived and evaluated by the public. LL-related language policies and the LL practices in three representative cities are sketched out as the backdrop for the language attitude exploration. A questionnaire survey was administered among 1302 participants from Eastern China to investigate their perception of and attitudes towards the urban multilingualism in their lived space. It is found that most participants are aware of the multilingual practices in the written environment, and they respond positively to the Chinese-dominant, English-rich multilingual practices in the LL. The inscriptions of English and other foreign languages are generally conceived of as instrumental in the construction of an international-oriented city image. Moreover, the non-standard language variations (e.g. Chinglish) in the LL tend to be seen as a problem, though traditional Chinese characters are not turned down. The findings in the study can help us gain an understanding of the bottom-up language ideologies in China and contribute to the ‘experiential’ dimension of LL studies.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAalborg Universitetsforlagen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMultilingualism in the linguistic landscape of Eastern China: City residents' perceptions and attitudesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright the authoren_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.globe.v12i.6501
dc.identifier.cristin1891188
dc.source.journalGlobe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communicationen_US
dc.source.pagenumber99-116en_US
dc.identifier.citationGlobe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication. 2021, 12, 99-116.en_US
dc.source.volume12en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal