Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDale, Jon Espen
dc.contributor.authorMolinelli, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorVischioni, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorVitolo, Viviana
dc.contributor.authorBonora, Maria
dc.contributor.authorMagro, Giuseppe
dc.contributor.authorMairani, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorHasegawa, Azusa
dc.contributor.authorOhno, Tatsuya
dc.contributor.authorDahl, Olav
dc.contributor.authorValvo, Francesca
dc.contributor.authorFossati, Piero
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-06T11:06:50Z
dc.date.available2021-08-06T11:06:50Z
dc.date.created2021-01-04T13:14:24Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn2234-943X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2766787
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose: The Italian National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO) has applied dose constraints for carbon ion RT (CIRT) as defined by Japan’s National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS). However, these institutions use different models to predict the relative biological effectiveness (RBE). CNAO applies the Local Effect Model I (LEM I), which in most clinical situations predicts higher RBE than NIRS’s Microdosimetric Kinetic Model (MKM). Equal constraints therefore become more restrictive at CNAO. Tolerance doses for the brainstem have not been validated for LEM I-weighted dose (DLEM I). However, brainstem constraints and a Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) model were recently reported for MKM-weighted dose (DMKM), showing that a constraint relaxation to DMKM|0.7 cm3 <30 Gy (RBE) and DMKM|0.1 cm3 <40 Gy (RBE) was feasible. The aim of this work was to evaluate the brainstem NTCP associated with CNAO’s current clinical practice and to propose new brainstem constraints for LEM I-optimized CIRT at CNAO. Material and Methods: We reproduced the absorbed dose of 30 representative patient treatment plans from CNAO. Subsequently, we calculated both DLEM I and DMKM, and the relationship between DMKM and DLEM I for various brainstem dose metrics was analyzed. Furthermore, the NTCP model developed for DMKM was applied to estimate the NTCPs of the delivered plans. Results: The translation of CNAO treatment plans to DMKM confirmed that the former CNAO constraints were conservative compared with DMKM constraints. Estimated NTCPs were 0% for all but one case, in which the NTCP was 2%. The relationship DMKM/DLEM I could be described by a quadratic regression model which revealed that the validated DMKM constraints corresponded to DLEM I|0.7 cm3 <41 Gy (RBE) (95% CI, 38–44 Gy (RBE)) and DLEM I|0.1 cm3 <49 Gy (RBE) (95% CI, 46–52 Gy (RBE)). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that RBE-weighted dose translation is of crucial importance in order to exchange experience and thus harmonize CIRT treatments globally. To mitigate uncertainties involved, we propose to use the lower bound of the 95% CI of the translation estimates, i.e., DLEM I|0.7 cm3 <38 Gy (RBE) and DLEM I|0.1 cm3 <46 Gy (RBE) as brainstem dose constraints for 16 fraction CIRT treatments optimized with LEM I.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiersen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleBrainstem NTCP and dose constraints for carbon ion RT—Application and translation from Japanese to European RBE-weighted doseen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumber531344en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fonc.2020.531344
dc.identifier.cristin1864804
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Oncologyen_US
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Oncology. 2020, 10, 531344.en_US
dc.source.volume10en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal