Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGloppen, Siri
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-28T09:39:09Z
dc.date.available2022-01-28T09:39:09Z
dc.date.created2022-01-12T00:20:40Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1808-2432
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2931198
dc.description.abstractWomen's sexual and reproductive rights are politicized worldwide, with the most contentious right being the right to safe, legal abortion. In Latin America, where one stands on the issue of abortion has become a central identity marker; a salient issue in electoral mobilization, and a matter of coalition building and high politics. As a consequence, legalized contestation over abortion is raging across Latin America, and indeed much of the world. This article conceptualizes this as “abortion lawfare” and develops a framework for analyzing the complex dynamics and long-term, multi-sited strategies at play in the wars over abortion. The concept of lawfare – despite and, to some extent, because of its ideological uses and connotations – serves as a useful heuristic tool for grasping these dynamics, and the lawfare typology brings out the different facets of the phenomenon in terms of actors, strategies, and arenas and provides the basis for analyzing how, in any given context, actors face multiple and shifting opportunity structures. This, in turn, influences the strategies they pursue and what is achieved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFundação Getúlio Vargas Escola de Direitoen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.scielo.br/j/rdgv/a/7CV9SGHgDphL6L9TFTN6S8q/
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectLawfareen_US
dc.subjectLawfareen_US
dc.subjectAborten_US
dc.subjectAbortionen_US
dc.subjectRettsmobiliseringen_US
dc.subjectLegal mobilizationen_US
dc.subjectDomstoleren_US
dc.subjectCourtsen_US
dc.titleConceptualizing Abortion Lawfareen_US
dc.title.alternativeConceituação de "Abortion Lawfare"en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.articlenumbere2143en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172202143
dc.identifier.cristin1978943
dc.source.journalDireito GV Law Reviewen_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 248159en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 230839en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Political science and organisational theory: 240en_US
dc.identifier.citationDireito GV Law Review. 2021, 17 (3), e2143.en_US
dc.source.volume17en_US
dc.source.issue3en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal