Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaso, Abdene Weya
dc.contributor.authorHailu, Alemayehu
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-28T12:47:10Z
dc.date.available2022-01-28T12:47:10Z
dc.date.created2021-12-27T19:26:08Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2939294
dc.description.abstractBackground Early diagnosis and treatment are one of the key strategies of tuberculosis control globally, and there are strong efforts in detecting and treating tuberculosis cases in Ethiopia. Smear microscopy examination has been a routine diagnostic test for pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis in resource-constrained settings for decades. Recently, many countries, including Ethiopia, are scaling up the use of Gene Xpert without the evaluation of the cost and cost-effectiveness implications of this strategy. Therefore, this study evaluated the cost and cost-effectiveness of Gene Xpert (MTB/RIF) and smear microscopy tests to diagnosis tuberculosis patients in Ethiopia. Methods We compared the costs and cost-effectiveness of tuberculosis diagnosis using smear microscopy and Gene Xpert among 1332 patients per intervention in the Arsi zone. We applied combinations of top-down and bottom-up costing approaches. The costs were estimated from the health providers’ perspective within one year (2017–2018). We employed “cases detected” as an effectiveness measure, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated by dividing the changes in cost and change in effectiveness. All costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were reported in 2018 US$. Results The unit cost per test for Gene Xpert was USD 12.9 whereas it is USD 3.1 for AFB smear microscopy testing. The cost per TB case detected was USD 77.9 for Gene Xpert while it was USD 55.8 for the smear microscopy method. The cartridge kit cost accounted for 42% of the overall Gene Xpert’s costs and the cost of the reagents and consumables accounted for 41.3% (USD 1.3) of the unit cost for the smear microscopy method. The ICER for the Gene Xpert strategy was USD 20.0 per tuberculosis case detected. Conclusion Using Gene Xpert as a routine test instead of standard care (smear microscopy) can be potentially cost-effective. In the cost scenario analysis, the price of the cartridge, the number of tests performed per day, and the life span of the capital equipment were the drivers of the unit cost of the Gene Xpert method. Therefore, Gene Xpert can be a part of the routine TB diagnostic testing strategy in Ethiopia.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPLOSen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCosts and cost-effectiveness of Gene Xpert compared to smear microscopy for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis using real-world data from Arsi zone, Ethiopiaen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumbere0259056en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0259056
dc.identifier.cristin1972309
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE. 2021, 16 (10), e0259056.en_US
dc.source.volume16en_US
dc.source.issue10en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal