Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBertelsen, Bjørn Enge
dc.contributor.authorLlera Blanes, Ruy Jesus
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-23T13:31:10Z
dc.date.available2022-06-23T13:31:10Z
dc.date.created2022-06-17T09:28:32Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0964-0282
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3000283
dc.description.abstractWe begin by thanking our colleague Eldar Bråten for taking the time to read and comment on our article with such thoroughness. We continue right away with a response. A key aspect of Bråten’s critique is his claim that it is difficult to understand how we reason and, therefore, ‘how to discern substantial arguments in texts that overflow with evocative and metaphoric prose?’ In order to reply to such a concern, we choose to, first, take a step back and provide a backdrop to our anthropological thinking (and, therefore, reasoning and ‘prose’) and how it is situated within a longer trajectory of thought. Thereafter, we turn to his specific concerns with our approach to utopia.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBerghahnen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCracks in the System and Anthropology. A response to Bråtenen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright the authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.3167/saas.2022.300111
dc.identifier.cristin2032723
dc.source.journalSocial Anthropologyen_US
dc.source.pagenumber140-147en_US
dc.identifier.citationSocial Anthropology. 2022, 30 (1), 140-147.en_US
dc.source.volume30en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal