Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Leo
dc.contributor.authorWensaas, Knut-Arne
dc.contributor.authorEmberland, Knut Erik
dc.contributor.authorRørtveit, Guri
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-29T13:52:19Z
dc.date.available2022-12-29T13:52:19Z
dc.date.created2022-09-22T11:21:04Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0281-3432
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3039917
dc.description.abstractObjective Examine characteristics and time trends of respiratory tract infection (RTI) consultations in Norwegian primary care and compare consultations in daytime general practice and out-of-hours (OOH) services. Design Registry-based study using reimbursement claims data. Setting All in-person primary care consultations during 2006–2015. Patients All patients visiting primary care during the study period. Main outcome measures The main outcome variable was RTI consultations. Differences regarding service type (general practice or OOH services) and changes over time were investigated. We report associations with patient age and sex, season, point-of-care C-reactive protein (CRP) test use, and sickness certificate issuing. Results RTI consultations (n = 16 304 777) represented 11.6% of all consultations (N = 140 199 637) in primary care over the ten-year period. The annual number of RTI consultations per 1000 inhabitants decreased from 335 to 314, while the number of consultations for any reason increased. Of RTI consultations, 83.2% occurred in general practice. OOH services had a higher proportion of RTI consultations (21.4%) compared with general practice (10.6%). Young children (0–4 years) represented 18.9% of all patients in RTI consultations. CRP testing was used in 56.2% of RTI consultations, and use increased over time. Sickness certificates were issued in 31.9% of RTI consultations with patients of working age (20–67 years). Conclusion Most RTI consultations occurred in general practice, although the proportion was higher in OOH services. Laboratory testing and/or issuing of sickness certificates were part of most consultations. This could be an important reason for seeking health care.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleRespiratory tract infections in Norwegian primary care 2006–2015: a registry-based studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02813432.2022.2069711
dc.identifier.cristin2054266
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Careen_US
dc.source.pagenumber173-180en_US
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 2022, 40 (2), 173-180.en_US
dc.source.volume40en_US
dc.source.issue2en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal