Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorZheng, Yuhao
dc.contributor.authorXiong, Chao
dc.contributor.authorJin, Yaqi
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Dun
dc.contributor.authorOksavik, Kjellmar
dc.contributor.authorXu, Chunyu
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Yixun
dc.contributor.authorGao, Shunzu
dc.contributor.authorWang, Fengjue
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hui
dc.contributor.authorYin, Fan
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-03T13:57:14Z
dc.date.available2023-02-03T13:57:14Z
dc.date.created2023-01-13T13:00:29Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2115-7251
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3048364
dc.description.abstractDifferent indices have been used to reflect, or monitor the ionospheric scintillation, e.g. the detrended carrier phase, σφ, S4, the rate of change of the vertical total electron content index (vROTI), as well as the ionosphere‐free linear combination (IFLC) of two carrier phases. However, few studies have been performed to investigate the refractive and diffractive contributions to these indices, especially during geomagnetic storms. In this study, we analyze the high-resolution (50 Hz) phase and amplitude measurements from four high-latitude stations in Svalbard, Norway during the geomagnetic storm on 7–8 September 2017. Our results show that at high latitudes, the high-pass filter with a standard cutoff frequency of 0.1 Hz sometimes cannot effectively remove the refraction-driven phase variations, especially during the geomagnetic storm, leading to a remaining refraction contribution to the detrended carrier phase and σφ when scintillation happens. In the meanwhile, as vROTI is sensitive to the TEC gradients, regardless of small- or large-scale ionospheric structures, both refraction and diffraction effects can cause visible fluctuations of vROTI. For most of the scintillation events, the phase indices (including detrended carrier phase, σφ, and vROTI), IFLC, and S4 show consistent fluctuations, indicating that diffraction usually occurs simultaneously with refraction during scintillation. One interesting feature is that although the IFLC and S4 are thought to be both related to the diffraction effect, they do not always show simultaneous correspondence during scintillations. The IFLC is enhanced during the geomagnetic storm, while such a feature is not seen in S4. We suggest that the enhanced IFLC during the geomagnetic storm is caused by the increased high-frequency phase power, which should be related to the enhanced density of small-scale irregularities during storm periods.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherEDP Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe refractive and diffractive contributions to GPS signal scintillation at high latitudes during the geomagnetic storm on 7-8 September 2017en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.source.articlenumber40en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1051/swsc/2022036
dc.identifier.cristin2106553
dc.source.journalJournal of Space Weather and Space Climateen_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Space Weather and Space Climate. 2022, 12, 40.en_US
dc.source.volume12en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal