Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKumar, Mohan
dc.contributor.authorShaikh, Saijuddin
dc.contributor.authorSinha, Bireshwar
dc.contributor.authorUpadhyay, Ravi Prakash
dc.contributor.authorChoudhary, Tarun Shankar
dc.contributor.authorChandola, Temsunaro Rongsen
dc.contributor.authorMazumder, Sarmila
dc.contributor.authorTaneja, Sunita
dc.contributor.authorBhandari, Nita
dc.contributor.authorChowdhury, Ranadip
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-17T11:54:34Z
dc.date.available2023-04-17T11:54:34Z
dc.date.created2022-10-24T11:06:00Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0031-4005
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3063349
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Many preterm and low birth weight (LBW) infants have low vitamin D stores. The objective of this study was to assess effects of enteral vitamin D supplementation compared with no vitamin D supplementation in human milk fed preterm or LBW infants. METHODS Data sources include Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, and Embase from inception to March 16, 2021. The study selection included randomized trials. Data were extracted and pooled with fixed and random-effects models. RESULTS We found 3 trials (2479 participants) that compared vitamin D to no vitamin D. At 6 months, there was increase in weight-for-age z-scores (mean difference 0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01 to 0.22, 1 trial, 1273 participants), height-for-age z-scores (mean difference 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.21, 1 trial, 1258 participants); at 3 months there was decrease in vitamin D deficiency (risk ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.68, I2=58%, 2 trials, 504 participants) in vitamin D supplementation groups. However, there was little or no effect on mortality, any serious morbidity, hospitalization, head circumference, growth to 6 years and neurodevelopment. The certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Fourteen trials (1969 participants) assessed dose and reported no effect on mortality, morbidity, growth, or neurodevelopment, except on parathyroid hormone and vitamin D status. No studies assessed timing. Limitations include heterogeneity and small sample size in included studies. CONCLUSIONS Enteral vitamin D supplementation improves growth and vitamin D status in preterm and LBW infants.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAAPen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleEnteral Vitamin D Supplementation in Preterm or Low Birth Weight Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.articlenumbere2022057092Ken_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1542/peds.2022-057092K
dc.identifier.cristin2064278
dc.source.journalPediatricsen_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 223269en_US
dc.identifier.citationPediatrics. 2022, 150 (Supplement 1), e2022057092K.en_US
dc.source.volume150en_US
dc.source.issueSupplement 1en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal