Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStrømsnes, Torbjørn Austveg
dc.contributor.authorHagen, Truls Jørgen Kaugerud
dc.contributor.authorOuyang, Menglu
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xia
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chen
dc.contributor.authorRygg, Silje-Emilie Soltvedt
dc.contributor.authorHewson, David
dc.contributor.authorLenthall, Rob
dc.contributor.authorMcConachie, Norman
dc.contributor.authorIzzath, Wazim
dc.contributor.authorBath, Philip M
dc.contributor.authorDhillon, Permesh Singh
dc.contributor.authorPodlasek, Anna
dc.contributor.authorEngland, Timothy
dc.contributor.authorSprigg, Nikola
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Thompson G
dc.contributor.authorAdvani, Rajiv
dc.contributor.authorIhle-Hansen, Hege
dc.contributor.authorSandset, Else Charlotte
dc.contributor.authorKrishnan, Kailash
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-24T12:37:44Z
dc.date.available2023-04-24T12:37:44Z
dc.date.created2022-05-26T14:48:57Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2396-9873
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3064528
dc.description.abstractBackground Low blood pressure (BP) in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is associated with poor functional outcome, death, or severe disability. Increasing BP might benefit patients with post-stroke hypotension including those with potentially salvageable ischaemic penumbra. This updated systematic review considers the present evidence regarding the use of vasopressors in AIS. Methods We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, EMBASE and trial databases using a structured search strategy. We examined reference lists of relevant publications for additional studies examining BP elevation in AIS. Results We included 27 studies involving 1886 patients. Nine studies assessed increasing BP during acute reperfusion therapy (intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, intra-arterial thrombolysis or combined). Eighteen studies tested BP elevation alone. Phenylephrine was the most commonly used agent to increase BP (n = 16 studies), followed by norepinephrine (n = 6), epinephrine (n = 3) and dopamine (n = 2). Because of small patient numbers and study heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not possible. Overall, BP elevation was feasible in patients with fluctuating or worsening neurological symptoms, large vessel occlusion with labile BP, sustained post-stroke hypotension and ineligible for intravenous thrombolysis or after acute reperfusion therapy. The effects on functional outcomes were largely unknown and close monitoring is advised if such intervention is undertaken. Conclusion Although theoretical arguments support increasing BP to improve cerebral blood flow and sustain the ischaemic penumbra in selected AIS patients, the data are limited and results largely inconclusive. Large, randomised controlled trials are needed to identify the optimal BP target, agent, duration of treatment and effects on clinical outcomes.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titlePressor therapy in acute ischaemic stroke: an updated systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/23969873221078136
dc.identifier.cristin2027577
dc.source.journalEuropean Stroke Journalen_US
dc.source.pagenumber99-116en_US
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Stroke Journal. 2022, 7 (2), 99-116.en_US
dc.source.volume7en_US
dc.source.issue2en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel