Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHelland, Trond
dc.contributor.authorHollekim, Ragnhild
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-05T07:53:16Z
dc.date.available2023-05-05T07:53:16Z
dc.date.created2023-05-04T09:36:37Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0927-5568
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3066356
dc.description.abstractThis article aims to examine the intersection where parents’ rights meet children’s rights in care order cases forwarded to the European Court of Human Rights, and how the court balances such rights in their rulings. The article reveals that both biological parents and children’s rights, in care order cases, are of less significance. It is the child’s interests which is the over-ruling argument. However, the article’s findings reveal that the biological parents’ standing in the ECtHR has increased in the latter years. Previous research has revealed that the ECtHR has turned towards a more child-centered approach in their deliberation (cf. ). This article argues that the ECtHR has taken a turn towards a more family-centered approach, rather than child- or parent-centered.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBrillen_US
dc.titleCare Order Cases in the European Court of Human Rights. Parents vs. children's rightsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 the authorsen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/15718182-31010007
dc.identifier.cristin2145336
dc.source.journalThe International Journal of Children's Rightsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber190-224en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe International Journal of Children's Rights. 2023, 31 (1), 190-224.en_US
dc.source.volume31en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record