Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMorton, Anthony Charles
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-02T23:39:02Z
dc.date.available2023-08-02T23:39:02Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-29
dc.date.submitted2023-08-01T22:01:08Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3082424
dc.descriptionRevised version. Minor formatting and spelling errors corrected.
dc.description.abstractThe origins of image-making can be traced back over 73,000 years. Image-making in contemporary art differs significantly from that of our ancestors. One explanation for this is that changes in our conception of image-making bring about corresponding changes in image-making itself. However, it remains uncertain whether this transformation represents a progression and to what extent theoretical constructs have played a role. The topic of this thesis is artistic progress. The general question is whether the notion of progress applies to visual art and, in the case it does, in what sense and how? The more specific question is whether progress is intelligible despite art’s pluralism? I show that these concerns are met through the noetic account of artistic progress. According to the noetic account, artistic progress is made with respect to understanding image-making. This affords progress to art-practice through the integration of enhanced understanding.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherThe University of Bergen
dc.rightsCopyright the Author. All rights reserved
dc.subjectunderstanding
dc.subjectart theory
dc.subjectimage-making
dc.subjectartistic progress
dc.subjectart-practice
dc.titleArtistic Progress. Towards an Applied Philosophy of Image-Making
dc.typeMaster thesis
dc.date.updated2023-08-01T22:01:08Z
dc.rights.holderCopyright the Author. All rights reserved
dc.description.degreePhilosophy - Master's Thesis
dc.description.localcodeFILO350
dc.description.localcodeMAHF-FILO
dc.subject.nus713505
fs.subjectcodeFILO350
fs.unitcode11-62-0


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel